Alexei Starovoitov
95ff141e52
samples/bpf: add map_lookup microbenchmark
$ map_perf_test 128 speed of HASH bpf_map_lookup_elem() in lookups per second w/o JIT w/JIT before 46M 58M after 42M 74M perf report before: 54.23% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __htab_map_lookup_elem 14.24% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] lookup_elem_raw 8.84% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] htab_map_lookup_elem 5.93% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] bpf_map_lookup_elem 2.30% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] bpf_prog_da4fc6a3f41761a2 1.49% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] kprobe_ftrace_handler after: 60.03% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __htab_map_lookup_elem 18.07% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] lookup_elem_raw 2.91% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] bpf_prog_da4fc6a3f41761a2 1.94% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _einittext 1.90% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __audit_syscall_exit 1.72% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] kprobe_ftrace_handler Notice that bpf_map_lookup_elem() and htab_map_lookup_elem() are trivial functions, yet they take sizeable amount of cpu time. htab_map_gen_lookup() removes bpf_map_lookup_elem() and converts htab_map_lookup_elem() into three BPF insns which causing cpu time for bpf_prog_da4fc6a3f41761a2() slightly increase. $ map_perf_test 256 speed of ARRAY bpf_map_lookup_elem() in lookups per second w/o JIT w/JIT before 97M 174M after 64M 280M before: 37.33% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] array_map_lookup_elem 13.95% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] bpf_map_lookup_elem 6.54% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] bpf_prog_da4fc6a3f41761a2 4.57% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] kprobe_ftrace_handler after: 32.86% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] bpf_prog_da4fc6a3f41761a2 6.54% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] kprobe_ftrace_handler array_map_gen_lookup() removes calls to array_map_lookup_elem() and bpf_map_lookup_elem() and replaces them with 7 bpf insns. The performance without JIT is slower, since executing extra insns in the interpreter is slower than running native C code, but with JIT the performance gains are obvious, since native C->x86 code is replaced with fewer bpf->x86 instructions. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
…
…
Linux kernel ============ This file was moved to Documentation/admin-guide/README.rst Please notice that there are several guides for kernel developers and users. These guides can be rendered in a number of formats, like HTML and PDF. In order to build the documentation, use ``make htmldocs`` or ``make pdfdocs``. There are various text files in the Documentation/ subdirectory, several of them using the Restructured Text markup notation. See Documentation/00-INDEX for a list of what is contained in each file. Please read the Documentation/process/changes.rst file, as it contains the requirements for building and running the kernel, and information about the problems which may result by upgrading your kernel.
Description
Languages
C
97.6%
Assembly
1%
Shell
0.5%
Python
0.3%
Makefile
0.3%