Paul Turner 9bbd737436 sched: update correct entity's runtime in check_preempt_wakeup()
While looking at check_preempt_wakeup() I realized that we are
potentially updating the wrong entity in the fair-group scheduling
case. In this case the current task's cfs_rq may not be the same as
the one used for the comparison between the waking task and the
existing task's vruntime.

This potentially results in us using a stale vruntime in the
pre-emption decision, providing a small false preference for the
previous task. The effects of this are bounded since we always
perform a hierarchal update on the tick.

Signed-off-by: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAPM31R+2Ke2urUZKao5W92_LupdR4AYEv-EZWiJ3tG=tEes2cw@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-07-21 18:01:43 +02:00
..
2011-03-31 11:26:23 -03:00
2011-03-31 11:26:23 -03:00
2011-03-14 09:15:23 -04:00
2010-10-30 01:42:19 -04:00
2011-05-19 18:51:57 +10:00
2011-05-26 17:12:34 -07:00
2011-03-31 11:26:23 -03:00
2011-05-29 11:32:28 -07:00
2011-05-17 23:19:17 +02:00
2010-10-01 10:50:58 -07:00
2011-03-31 11:26:23 -03:00
2011-05-26 17:12:34 -07:00
2011-05-26 17:12:34 -07:00
2011-03-31 11:26:23 -03:00
2011-04-18 10:35:30 -07:00
2011-05-24 12:10:51 +02:00
2011-05-20 12:50:29 -07:00
2011-03-31 11:26:23 -03:00
2011-04-24 13:18:38 +02:00
2011-07-21 18:00:01 +02:00
2011-03-23 19:46:51 -07:00
2011-03-31 11:26:23 -03:00
2011-03-31 11:26:23 -03:00