IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
When we did sysbench test for inline files, enospc error happened easily though
there was lots of free disk space which could be allocated for new chunks.
Reproduce steps:
# mkfs.btrfs -b $((2 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024)) <test partition>
# mount <test partition> /mnt
# ulimit -n 102400
# cd /mnt
# sysbench --num-threads=1 --test=fileio --file-num=81920 \
> --file-total-size=80M --file-block-size=1K --file-io-mode=sync \
> --file-test-mode=seqwr prepare
# sysbench --num-threads=1 --test=fileio --file-num=81920 \
> --file-total-size=80M --file-block-size=1K --file-io-mode=sync \
> --file-test-mode=seqwr run
<soon later, BUG_ON() was triggered by enospc error>
The reason of this bug is:
Now, we can reserve space which is larger than the free space in the chunks if
we have enough free disk space which can be used for new chunks. By this way,
the space allocator should allocate a new chunk by force if there is no free
space in the free space cache. But there are two wrong checks which break this
operation.
One is
if (ret == -ENOSPC && num_bytes > min_alloc_size)
in btrfs_reserve_extent(), it is wrong, we should try to allocate a new chunk
even we fail to allocate free space by minimum allocable size.
The other is
if (space_info->force_alloc)
force = space_info->force_alloc;
in do_chunk_alloc(). It makes the allocator ignore CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE If someone
sets ->force_alloc to CHUNK_ALLOC_LIMITED, and makes the enospc error happen.
Fix these two wrong checks. Especially the second one, we fix it by changing
the value of CHUNK_ALLOC_LIMITED and CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE, and make
CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE greater than CHUNK_ALLOC_LIMITED since CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE has
higher priority. And if the value which is passed in by the caller is greater
than ->force_alloc, use the passed value.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
9e622d6bea