Zhang Yi 9ffa07c699 ext2: correct max file size computing
[ Upstream commit 50b3a818991074177a56c87124c7a7bdf5fa4f67 ]

We need to calculate the max file size accurately if the total blocks
that can address by block tree exceed the upper_limit. But this check is
not correct now, it only compute the total data blocks but missing
metadata blocks are needed. So in the case of "data blocks < upper_limit
&& total blocks > upper_limit", we will get wrong result. Fortunately,
this case could not happen in reality, but it's confused and better to
correct the computing.

  bits   data blocks   metadatablocks   upper_limit
  10        16843020            66051    2147483647
  11       134480396           263171    1073741823
  12      1074791436          1050627     536870911 (*)
  13      8594130956          4198403     268435455 (*)
  14     68736258060         16785411     134217727 (*)
  15    549822930956         67125251      67108863 (*)
  16   4398314962956        268468227      33554431 (*)

  [*] Need to calculate in depth.

Fixes: 1c2d14212b15 ("ext2: Fix underflow in ext2_max_size()")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220212050532.179055-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2022-04-08 14:40:18 +02:00
..
2020-10-16 11:11:22 -07:00
2021-09-18 13:40:15 +02:00
2021-11-18 14:04:15 +01:00
2020-09-10 14:03:31 -07:00
2021-12-22 09:30:57 +01:00
2020-08-04 21:02:38 -04:00
2021-11-26 10:39:22 +01:00
2020-07-31 08:16:01 +02:00
2020-10-23 11:33:41 -07:00
2020-10-23 11:33:41 -07:00
2021-12-14 11:32:40 +01:00
2020-10-24 12:40:18 -07:00
2020-08-27 16:06:47 -04:00
2020-07-31 08:16:01 +02:00