Ido Schimmel 8bcfb4ae4d selftests: forwarding: Fix failing tests with old libnet
The custom multipath hash tests use mausezahn in order to test how
changes in various packet fields affect the packet distribution across
the available nexthops.

The tool uses the libnet library for various low-level packet
construction and injection. The library started using the
"SO_BINDTODEVICE" socket option for IPv6 sockets in version 1.1.6 and
for IPv4 sockets in version 1.2.

When the option is not set, packets are not routed according to the
table associated with the VRF master device and tests fail.

Fix this by prefixing the command with "ip vrf exec", which will cause
the route lookup to occur in the VRF routing table. This makes the tests
pass regardless of the libnet library version.

Fixes: 511e8db54036 ("selftests: forwarding: Add test for custom multipath hash")
Fixes: 185b0c190bb6 ("selftests: forwarding: Add test for custom multipath hash with IPv4 GRE")
Fixes: b7715acba4d3 ("selftests: forwarding: Add test for custom multipath hash with IPv6 GRE")
Reported-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220809113320.751413-1-idosch@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-08-10 22:36:14 -07:00
..
2022-05-04 11:21:32 +01:00

Motivation
==========

One of the nice things about network namespaces is that they allow one
to easily create and test complex environments.

Unfortunately, these namespaces can not be used with actual switching
ASICs, as their ports can not be migrated to other network namespaces
(NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL) and most of them probably do not support the
L1-separation provided by namespaces.

However, a similar kind of flexibility can be achieved by using VRFs and
by looping the switch ports together. For example:

                             br0
                              +
               vrf-h1         |           vrf-h2
                 +        +---+----+        +
                 |        |        |        |
    192.0.2.1/24 +        +        +        + 192.0.2.2/24
               swp1     swp2     swp3     swp4
                 +        +        +        +
                 |        |        |        |
                 +--------+        +--------+

The VRFs act as lightweight namespaces representing hosts connected to
the switch.

This approach for testing switch ASICs has several advantages over the
traditional method that requires multiple physical machines, to name a
few:

1. Only the device under test (DUT) is being tested without noise from
other system.

2. Ability to easily provision complex topologies. Testing bridging
between 4-ports LAGs or 8-way ECMP requires many physical links that are
not always available. With the VRF-based approach one merely needs to
loopback more ports.

These tests are written with switch ASICs in mind, but they can be run
on any Linux box using veth pairs to emulate physical loopbacks.

Guidelines for Writing Tests
============================

o Where possible, reuse an existing topology for different tests instead
  of recreating the same topology.
o Tests that use anything but the most trivial topologies should include
  an ASCII art showing the topology.
o Where possible, IPv6 and IPv4 addresses shall conform to RFC 3849 and
  RFC 5737, respectively.
o Where possible, tests shall be written so that they can be reused by
  multiple topologies and added to lib.sh.
o Checks shall be added to lib.sh for any external dependencies.
o Code shall be checked using ShellCheck [1] prior to submission.

1. https://www.shellcheck.net/