IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Often when running generic/562 from fstests we can hang during unmount,
resulting in a trace like this:
Sep 07 11:52:00 debian9 unknown: run fstests generic/562 at 2022-09-07 11:52:00
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: INFO: task umount:49438 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: Not tainted 6.0.0-rc2-btrfs-next-122 #1
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: task:umount state:D stack: 0 pid:49438 ppid: 25683 flags:0x00004000
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: Call Trace:
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: <TASK>
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: __schedule+0x3c8/0xec0
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x70
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: schedule+0x5d/0xf0
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: schedule_timeout+0xf1/0x130
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: ? lock_release+0x224/0x4a0
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: ? lock_acquired+0x1a0/0x420
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x2c/0xd0
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: __wait_for_common+0xac/0x200
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: ? usleep_range_state+0xb0/0xb0
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: __flush_work+0x26d/0x530
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: ? flush_workqueue_prep_pwqs+0x140/0x140
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: ? trace_clock_local+0xc/0x30
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: __cancel_work_timer+0x11f/0x1b0
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: ? close_ctree+0x12b/0x5b3 [btrfs]
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: ? __trace_bputs+0x10b/0x170
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: close_ctree+0x152/0x5b3 [btrfs]
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: ? evict_inodes+0x166/0x1c0
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: generic_shutdown_super+0x71/0x120
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs]
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: deactivate_locked_super+0x2e/0xa0
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: cleanup_mnt+0x100/0x160
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: task_work_run+0x59/0xa0
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1a6/0x1b0
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x16/0x40
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: do_syscall_64+0x48/0x90
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: RIP: 0033:0x7fcde59a57a7
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: RSP: 002b:00007ffe914217c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007fcde5ae8264 RCX: 00007fcde59a57a7
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 000055b57556cdd0
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: RBP: 000055b57556cba0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffe91420570
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: R13: 000055b57556cdd0 R14: 000055b57556ccb8 R15: 0000000000000000
Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: </TASK>
What happens is the following:
1) The cleaner kthread tries to start a transaction to delete an unused
block group, but the metadata reservation can not be satisfied right
away, so a reservation ticket is created and it starts the async
metadata reclaim task (fs_info->async_reclaim_work);
2) Writeback for all the filler inodes with an i_size of 2K starts
(generic/562 creates a lot of 2K files with the goal of filling
metadata space). We try to create an inline extent for them, but we
fail when trying to insert the inline extent with -ENOSPC (at
cow_file_range_inline()) - since this is not critical, we fallback
to non-inline mode (back to cow_file_range()), reserve extents, create
extent maps and create the ordered extents;
3) An unmount starts, enters close_ctree();
4) The async reclaim task is flushing stuff, entering the flush states one
by one, until it reaches RUN_DELAYED_IPUTS. There it runs all current
delayed iputs.
After running the delayed iputs and before calling
btrfs_wait_on_delayed_iputs(), one or more ordered extents complete,
and btrfs_add_delayed_iput() is called for each one through
btrfs_finish_ordered_io() -> btrfs_put_ordered_extent(). This results
in bumping fs_info->nr_delayed_iputs from 0 to some positive value.
So the async reclaim task blocks at btrfs_wait_on_delayed_iputs() waiting
for fs_info->nr_delayed_iputs to become 0;
5) The current transaction is committed by the transaction kthread, we then
start unpinning extents and end up calling btrfs_try_granting_tickets()
through unpin_extent_range(), since we released some space.
This results in satisfying the ticket created by the cleaner kthread at
step 1, waking up the cleaner kthread;
6) At close_ctree() we ask the cleaner kthread to park;
7) The cleaner kthread starts the transaction, deletes the unused block
group, and then calls kthread_should_park(), which returns true, so it
parks. And at this point we have the delayed iputs added by the
completion of the ordered extents still pending;
8) Then later at close_ctree(), when we call:
cancel_work_sync(&fs_info->async_reclaim_work);
We hang forever, since the cleaner was parked and no one else can run
delayed iputs after that, while the reclaim task is waiting for the
remaining delayed iputs to be completed.
Fix this by waiting for all ordered extents to complete and running the
delayed iputs before attempting to stop the async reclaim tasks. Note that
we can not wait for ordered extents with btrfs_wait_ordered_roots() (or
other similar functions) because that waits for the BTRFS_ORDERED_COMPLETE
flag to be set on an ordered extent, but the delayed iput is added after
that, when doing the final btrfs_put_ordered_extent(). So instead wait for
the work queues used for executing ordered extent completion to be empty,
which works because we do the final put on an ordered extent at
btrfs_finish_ordered_io() (while we are in the unmount context).
Fixes: d6fd0ae25c6495 ("Btrfs: fix missing delayed iputs on unmount")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
a362bb864b