linux/Documentation/scsi
Henrik Austad a7ddcea58a Drop all 00-INDEX files from Documentation/
This is a respin with a wider audience (all that get_maintainer returned)
and I know this spams a *lot* of people. Not sure what would be the correct
way, so my apologies for ruining your inbox.

The 00-INDEX files are supposed to give a summary of all files present
in a directory, but these files are horribly out of date and their
usefulness is brought into question. Often a simple "ls" would reveal
the same information as the filenames are generally quite descriptive as
a short introduction to what the file covers (it should not surprise
anyone what Documentation/sched/sched-design-CFS.txt covers)

A few years back it was mentioned that these files were no longer really
needed, and they have since then grown further out of date, so perhaps
it is time to just throw them out.

A short status yields the following _outdated_ 00-INDEX files, first
counter is files listed in 00-INDEX but missing in the directory, last
is files present but not listed in 00-INDEX.

List of outdated 00-INDEX:
Documentation: (4/10)
Documentation/sysctl: (0/1)
Documentation/timers: (1/0)
Documentation/blockdev: (3/1)
Documentation/w1/slaves: (0/1)
Documentation/locking: (0/1)
Documentation/devicetree: (0/5)
Documentation/power: (1/1)
Documentation/powerpc: (0/5)
Documentation/arm: (1/0)
Documentation/x86: (0/9)
Documentation/x86/x86_64: (1/1)
Documentation/scsi: (4/4)
Documentation/filesystems: (2/9)
Documentation/filesystems/nfs: (0/2)
Documentation/cgroup-v1: (0/2)
Documentation/kbuild: (0/4)
Documentation/spi: (1/0)
Documentation/virtual/kvm: (1/0)
Documentation/scheduler: (0/2)
Documentation/fb: (0/1)
Documentation/block: (0/1)
Documentation/networking: (6/37)
Documentation/vm: (1/3)

Then there are 364 subdirectories in Documentation/ with several files that
are missing 00-INDEX alltogether (and another 120 with a single file and no
00-INDEX).

I don't really have an opinion to whether or not we /should/ have 00-INDEX,
but the above 00-INDEX should either be removed or be kept up to date. If
we should keep the files, I can try to keep them updated, but I rather not
if we just want to delete them anyway.

As a starting point, remove all index-files and references to 00-INDEX and
see where the discussion is going.

Signed-off-by: Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>
Acked-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Just-do-it-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: [Almost everybody else]
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-09-09 15:08:58 -06:00
..
scsi_transport_srp
53c700.txt
aacraid.txt
advansys.txt
aha152x.txt
aic7xxx.txt
aic79xx.txt
arcmsr_spec.txt
bfa.txt
bnx2fc.txt
BusLogic.txt
ChangeLog.arcmsr
ChangeLog.ips
ChangeLog.lpfc
ChangeLog.megaraid
ChangeLog.megaraid_sas
ChangeLog.ncr53c8xx
ChangeLog.sym53c8xx
ChangeLog.sym53c8xx_2
cxgb3i.txt
dc395x.txt
dpti.txt
FlashPoint.txt
g_NCR5380.txt
hpsa.txt
hptiop.txt
libsas.txt
LICENSE.FlashPoint
LICENSE.qla2xxx
LICENSE.qla4xxx
link_power_management_policy.txt
lpfc.txt
megaraid.txt
ncr53c8xx.txt
NinjaSCSI.txt
osd.txt
osst.txt
ppa.txt
qlogicfas.txt
scsi_eh.txt block: remove BLK_EH_HANDLED 2018-05-29 08:59:21 -06:00
scsi_fc_transport.txt
scsi_mid_low_api.txt scsi: remove the old scsi_module.c initialization model 2018-03-19 22:54:47 -04:00
scsi-changer.txt
scsi-generic.txt
scsi-parameters.txt scsi: documentation: Obsolete documentation references 2018-03-21 18:34:20 -04:00
scsi.txt
sd-parameters.txt scsi: sd: Documentation: add sd-parameters.txt 2018-03-01 21:26:54 -05:00
smartpqi.txt scsi: smartpqi: correct spelling error in documentation 2017-10-23 04:15:17 -04:00
st.txt
sym53c8xx_2.txt
sym53c500_cs.txt
tcm_qla2xxx.txt
ufs.txt
wd719x.txt