Oleg Nesterov a7f0765edf ptrace: __ptrace_detach: do __wake_up_parent() if we reap the tracee
The bug is old, it wasn't cause by recent changes.

Test case:

	static void *tfunc(void *arg)
	{
		int pid = (long)arg;

		assert(ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, pid, NULL, NULL) == 0);
		kill(pid, SIGKILL);

		sleep(1);
		return NULL;
	}

	int main(void)
	{
		pthread_t th;
		long pid = fork();

		if (!pid)
			pause();

		signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN);
		assert(pthread_create(&th, NULL, tfunc, (void*)pid) == 0);

		int r = waitpid(-1, NULL, __WNOTHREAD);
		printf("waitpid: %d %m\n", r);

		return 0;
	}

Before the patch this program hangs, after this patch waitpid() correctly
fails with errno == -ECHILD.

The problem is, __ptrace_detach() reaps the EXIT_ZOMBIE tracee if its
->real_parent is our sub-thread and we ignore SIGCHLD.  But in this case
we should wake up other threads which can sleep in do_wait().

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Mayatskikh <vmayatsk@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-09-24 07:20:59 -07:00
..
2009-08-20 10:29:28 +10:00
2009-09-23 18:13:10 -07:00
2009-06-24 00:02:38 -04:00
2009-06-24 00:02:38 -04:00
2009-09-18 09:48:52 -07:00
2009-06-16 19:47:48 -07:00
2009-08-29 14:10:07 +02:00
2009-09-19 13:13:17 -07:00
2009-05-15 07:56:24 -05:00
2009-09-23 07:39:29 -07:00
2009-07-24 10:53:29 +02:00
2009-06-18 13:03:56 -07:00
2009-06-18 13:03:55 -07:00
2009-09-19 08:53:22 +02:00
2009-09-19 08:53:22 +02:00
2009-09-19 08:53:22 +02:00
2009-09-23 07:39:41 -07:00
2009-09-18 20:47:30 +02:00
2009-09-23 07:39:30 -07:00
2009-09-23 18:13:10 -07:00
2009-07-12 14:03:27 -07:00
2009-09-23 18:13:10 -07:00
2009-06-15 21:30:23 -07:00
2009-06-18 13:03:55 -07:00