Michael S. Tsirkin afd384f0db Revert "virtio-blk: support completion batching for the IRQ path"
This reverts commit 07b679f70d73483930e8d3c293942416d9cd5c13.

This change appears to have broken things...
We now see applications hanging during disk accesses.
e.g.
multi-port virtio-blk device running in h/w (FPGA)
Host running a simple 'fio' test.
[global]
thread=1
direct=1
ioengine=libaio
norandommap=1
group_reporting=1
bs=4K
rw=read
iodepth=128
runtime=1
numjobs=4
time_based
[job0]
filename=/dev/vda
[job1]
filename=/dev/vdb
[job2]
filename=/dev/vdc
...
[job15]
filename=/dev/vdp

i.e. 16 disks; 4 queues per disk; simple burst of 4KB reads
This is repeatedly run in a loop.

After a few, normally <10 seconds, fio hangs.
With 64 queues (16 disks), failure occurs within a few seconds; with 8 queues (2 disks) it may take ~hour before hanging.
Last message:
fio-3.19
Starting 8 threads
Jobs: 1 (f=1): [_(7),R(1)][68.3%][eta 03h:11m:06s]
I think this means at the end of the run 1 queue was left incomplete.

'diskstats' (run while fio is hung) shows no outstanding transactions.
e.g.
$ cat /proc/diskstats
...
252       0 vda 1843140071 0 14745120568 712568645 0 0 0 0 0 3117947 712568645 0 0 0 0 0 0
252      16 vdb 1816291511 0 14530332088 704905623 0 0 0 0 0 3117711 704905623 0 0 0 0 0 0
...

Other stats (in the h/w, and added to the virtio-blk driver ([a]virtio_queue_rq(), [b]virtblk_handle_req(), [c]virtblk_request_done()) all agree, and show every request had a completion, and that virtblk_request_done() never gets called.
e.g.
PF= 0                         vq=0           1           2           3
[a]request_count     -   839416590   813148916   105586179    84988123
[b]completion1_count -   839416590   813148916   105586179    84988123
[c]completion2_count -           0           0           0           0

PF= 1                         vq=0           1           2           3
[a]request_count     -   823335887   812516140   104582672    75856549
[b]completion1_count -   823335887   812516140   104582672    75856549
[c]completion2_count -           0           0           0           0

i.e. the issue is after the virtio-blk driver.

This change was introduced in kernel 6.3.0.
I am seeing this using 6.3.3.
If I run with an earlier kernel (5.15), it does not occur.
If I make a simple patch to the 6.3.3 virtio-blk driver, to skip the blk_mq_add_to_batch()call, it does not fail.
e.g.
kernel 5.15 - this is OK
virtio_blk.c,virtblk_done() [irq handler]
                 if (likely(!blk_should_fake_timeout(req->q))) {
                          blk_mq_complete_request(req);
                 }

kernel 6.3.3 - this fails
virtio_blk.c,virtblk_handle_req() [irq handler]
                 if (likely(!blk_should_fake_timeout(req->q))) {
                          if (!blk_mq_complete_request_remote(req)) {
                                  if (!blk_mq_add_to_batch(req, iob, virtblk_vbr_status(vbr), virtblk_complete_batch)) {
                                           virtblk_request_done(req);    //this never gets called... so blk_mq_add_to_batch() must always succeed
                                   }
                          }
                 }

If I do, kernel 6.3.3 - this is OK
virtio_blk.c,virtblk_handle_req() [irq handler]
                 if (likely(!blk_should_fake_timeout(req->q))) {
                          if (!blk_mq_complete_request_remote(req)) {
                                   virtblk_request_done(req); //force this here...
                                  if (!blk_mq_add_to_batch(req, iob, virtblk_vbr_status(vbr), virtblk_complete_batch)) {
                                           virtblk_request_done(req);    //this never gets called... so blk_mq_add_to_batch() must always succeed
                                   }
                          }
                 }

Perhaps you might like to fix/test/revert this change...
Martin

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306090826.C1fZmdMe-lkp@intel.com/
Cc: Suwan Kim <suwan.kim027@gmail.com>
Tested-by: edliaw@google.com
Reported-by: "Roberts, Martin" <martin.roberts@intel.com>
Message-Id: <336455b4f630f329380a8f53ee8cad3868764d5c.1686295549.git.mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2023-06-21 04:14:28 -04:00
2023-06-16 11:27:34 -07:00
2023-06-16 14:43:41 -07:00
2023-06-18 09:48:39 -07:00
2023-04-28 14:02:54 -07:00
2023-06-15 15:08:59 -07:00
2023-04-30 11:20:22 -07:00
2023-05-05 12:56:55 -07:00
2023-06-16 09:28:27 +02:00
2023-05-19 13:56:26 -04:00
2023-04-30 11:51:51 -07:00
2023-04-24 12:31:32 -07:00
2023-06-12 11:31:52 -07:00
2022-09-28 09:02:20 +02:00
2022-10-10 12:00:45 -07:00
2023-06-18 14:06:27 -07:00

Linux kernel
============

There are several guides for kernel developers and users. These guides can
be rendered in a number of formats, like HTML and PDF. Please read
Documentation/admin-guide/README.rst first.

In order to build the documentation, use ``make htmldocs`` or
``make pdfdocs``.  The formatted documentation can also be read online at:

    https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/

There are various text files in the Documentation/ subdirectory,
several of them using the Restructured Text markup notation.

Please read the Documentation/process/changes.rst file, as it contains the
requirements for building and running the kernel, and information about
the problems which may result by upgrading your kernel.
Description
No description provided
Readme 5.7 GiB
Languages
C 97.6%
Assembly 1%
Shell 0.5%
Python 0.3%
Makefile 0.3%