Paul Bolle b78a1f3722 [media] m920x: let GCC see 'ret' is used initialized
Since commit 7543f344e9b06afe86b55a2620f5c11b38bd5642 ("[media] m920x:
factor out a m920x_write_seq() function") building m920x.o triggers this
GCC warning:
    drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/m920x.c: In function ‘m920x_probe’:
    drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/m920x.c:91:6: warning: ‘ret’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
This warning is caused by m920x_write_seq(), which is apparently inlined
into m920x_probe(). It is clear why GCC thinks 'ret' may be used
uninitialized. But in practice the first seq->address will always be
non-zero when this function is called. That means we can change the
while()-do{} loop into a do{}-while() loop. And that suffices to make
GCC see that 'ret' will not be used uninitialized.

Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2013-03-18 17:35:24 -03:00
..
2013-02-21 15:27:22 -08:00
2013-02-27 19:10:15 -08:00
2013-02-27 19:10:15 -08:00
2013-02-27 19:10:15 -08:00
2013-03-01 13:39:00 -08:00
2013-02-21 12:11:44 -08:00
2013-03-01 22:45:52 +00:00
2013-02-27 19:10:17 -08:00
2013-03-02 08:31:39 -08:00
2013-03-02 16:33:54 -08:00
2013-02-21 15:38:49 -08:00
2013-02-27 19:10:18 -08:00
2013-02-26 09:34:29 -08:00
2013-02-27 19:10:18 -08:00
2013-02-28 09:37:12 +01:00
2013-03-02 11:42:16 -08:00
2013-02-21 15:27:22 -08:00
2013-02-27 19:10:19 -08:00
2013-03-03 10:24:57 -08:00
2013-02-27 19:10:19 -08:00
2013-02-28 19:59:34 -08:00
2013-03-03 14:22:53 -08:00
2013-02-22 23:31:31 -05:00
2013-02-21 13:57:13 -08:00