IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
On some host errors storvsc module tries to remove sdev by scheduling a job
which does the following:
sdev = scsi_device_lookup(wrk->host, 0, 0, wrk->lun);
if (sdev) {
scsi_remove_device(sdev);
scsi_device_put(sdev);
}
While this code seems correct the following crash is observed:
general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81169979>] [<ffffffff81169979>] bdi_destroy+0x39/0x220
...
[<ffffffff814aecdc>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2c/0x40
[<ffffffff8127b7db>] blk_cleanup_queue+0x17b/0x270
[<ffffffffa00b54c4>] __scsi_remove_device+0x54/0xd0 [scsi_mod]
[<ffffffffa00b556b>] scsi_remove_device+0x2b/0x40 [scsi_mod]
[<ffffffffa00ec47d>] storvsc_remove_lun+0x3d/0x60 [hv_storvsc]
[<ffffffff81080791>] process_one_work+0x1b1/0x530
...
The problem comes with the fact that many such jobs (for the same device)
are being scheduled simultaneously. While scsi_remove_device() uses
shost->scan_mutex and scsi_device_lookup() will fail for a device in
SDEV_DEL state there is no protection against someone who did
scsi_device_lookup() before we actually entered __scsi_remove_device(). So
the whole scenario looks like that: two callers do simultaneous (or
preemption happens) calls to scsi_device_lookup() ant these calls succeed
for both of them, after that they try doing scsi_remove_device().
shost->scan_mutex only serializes their calls to __scsi_remove_device()
and we end up doing the cleanup path twice.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
be821fd8e6