IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Lockdep reported that there is a potential for deadlock because
vcpu->arch.tbacct_lock is not irq-safe, and is sometimes taken inside
the rq_lock (run-queue lock) in the scheduler, which is taken within
interrupts. The lockdep splat looks like:
======================================================
[ INFO: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected ]
3.12.0-rc5-kvm+ #8 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
qemu-system-ppc/4803 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
(&(&vcpu->arch.tbacct_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<c0000000000947ac>] .kvmppc_core_vcpu_put_hv+0x2c/0xa0
and this task is already holding:
(&rq->lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<c000000000ac16c0>] .__schedule+0x180/0xaa0
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&rq->lock){-.-.-.} -> (&(&vcpu->arch.tbacct_lock)->rlock){+.+...}
but this new dependency connects a HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&rq->lock){-.-.-.}
... which became HARDIRQ-irq-safe at:
[<c00000000013797c>] .lock_acquire+0xbc/0x190
[<c000000000ac3c74>] ._raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x60
[<c0000000000f8564>] .scheduler_tick+0x54/0x180
[<c0000000000c2610>] .update_process_times+0x70/0xa0
[<c00000000012cdfc>] .tick_periodic+0x3c/0xe0
[<c00000000012cec8>] .tick_handle_periodic+0x28/0xb0
[<c00000000001ef40>] .timer_interrupt+0x120/0x2e0
[<c000000000002868>] decrementer_common+0x168/0x180
[<c0000000001c7ca4>] .get_page_from_freelist+0x924/0xc10
[<c0000000001c8e00>] .__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x200/0xba0
[<c0000000001c9eb8>] .alloc_pages_exact_nid+0x68/0x110
[<c000000000f4c3ec>] .page_cgroup_init+0x1e0/0x270
[<c000000000f24480>] .start_kernel+0x3e0/0x4e4
[<c000000000009d30>] .start_here_common+0x20/0x70
to a HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe lock:
(&(&vcpu->arch.tbacct_lock)->rlock){+.+...}
... which became HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe at:
... [<c00000000013797c>] .lock_acquire+0xbc/0x190
[<c000000000ac3c74>] ._raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x60
[<c0000000000946ac>] .kvmppc_core_vcpu_load_hv+0x2c/0x100
[<c00000000008394c>] .kvmppc_core_vcpu_load+0x2c/0x40
[<c000000000081000>] .kvm_arch_vcpu_load+0x10/0x30
[<c00000000007afd4>] .vcpu_load+0x64/0xd0
[<c00000000007b0f8>] .kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x68/0x730
[<c00000000025530c>] .do_vfs_ioctl+0x4dc/0x7a0
[<c000000000255694>] .SyS_ioctl+0xc4/0xe0
[<c000000000009ee4>] syscall_exit+0x0/0x98
Some users have reported this deadlock occurring in practice, though
the reports have been primarily on 3.10.x-based kernels.
This fixes the problem by making tbacct_lock be irq-safe.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
bf3d32e115