IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Flows leading to link->init() and link->exit() are not symmetric.
Currently the relevant part of card probe sequence goes as:
for_each_card_rtds(card, rtd)
for_each_rtd_components(rtd, i, component)
component->probe()
for_each_card_rtds(card, rtd)
for_each_rtd_dais(rtd, i, dai)
dai->probe()
for_each_card_rtds(card, rtd)
rtd->init()
On the other side, equivalent remove sequence goes as:
for_each_card_rtds(card, rtd)
for_each_rtd_dais(rtd, i, dai)
dai->remove()
for_each_card_rtds(card, rtd)
for_each_rtd_components(rtd, i, component)
component->remove()
for_each_card_rtds(card, rtd)
rtd->exit()
what can lead to errors as link->exit() may still operate on resources
owned by its components despite the probability of them being freed
during the component->remove().
This change modifies the remove sequence to:
for_each_card_rtds(card, rtd)
rtd->exit()
for_each_card_rtds(card, rtd)
for_each_rtd_dais(rtd, i, dai)
dai->remove()
for_each_card_rtds(card, rtd)
for_each_rtd_components(rtd, i, component)
component->remove()
so code found in link->exit() is safe to touch any component stuff as
component->remove() has not been called yet.
Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221027085840.1562698-1-cezary.rojewski@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>