Russell King ce7a3fdc5c [ARM] Remove rt_sigframe puc and pinfo pointers
These two members appear to be surplus to requirements.  Discussing
this issue with glibc folk:

| > Additionally, do you see any need for these weird "puc" and "pinfo"
| > pointers in the kernels rt_sigframe structure?  Can we kill them?
|
| We can kill them.  I checked with Phil B. about them last week, and he
| didn't remember any reason they still needed to be there.  And nothing
| should know where they are on the stack.  Unfortunately, doing this
| will upset GDB, which knows that the saved registers are 0x88 bytes
| above the stack pointer on entrance to an rt signal trampoline; but,
| since puc and pinfo are quite recognizable, I can adapt GDB to support
| the new layout if you want to remove them.

So remove them.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-06-18 16:17:41 +01:00
..
2006-03-21 22:06:17 +00:00
2005-10-30 17:37:32 -08:00
2006-03-27 14:58:25 +01:00
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
2006-03-22 10:22:58 +00:00
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
2006-03-15 14:57:13 +00:00
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
2006-04-20 21:48:02 +01:00
2006-03-28 22:05:10 +01:00