Mel Gorman ec5884cbbf sched/fair: Improve consistency of allowed NUMA balance calculations
[ Upstream commit 2cfb7a1b031b0e816af7a6ee0c6ab83b0acdf05a ]

There are inconsistencies when determining if a NUMA imbalance is allowed
that should be corrected.

o allow_numa_imbalance changes types and is not always examining
  the destination group so both the type should be corrected as
  well as the naming.
o find_idlest_group uses the sched_domain's weight instead of the
  group weight which is different to find_busiest_group
o find_busiest_group uses the source group instead of the destination
  which is different to task_numa_find_cpu
o Both find_idlest_group and find_busiest_group should account
  for the number of running tasks if a move was allowed to be
  consistent with task_numa_find_cpu

Fixes: 7d2b5dd0bcc4 ("sched/numa: Allow a floating imbalance between NUMA nodes")
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220208094334.16379-2-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2022-04-08 14:23:11 +02:00
..
2021-09-02 13:00:15 -07:00
2021-08-11 13:11:12 -07:00
2021-09-08 15:32:35 -07:00
2022-03-08 19:12:49 +01:00
2021-06-18 11:43:08 +02:00
2021-09-08 15:32:34 -07:00
2021-05-07 00:26:33 -07:00
2021-08-11 14:47:16 +02:00
2021-05-07 00:26:34 -07:00