IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
If we configure musb with 2430 glue as a peripheral, and then rmmod
omap2430 module, we'll get the following error:
[ INFO: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected ]
...
rmmod/413 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
(&phy->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c04b9fd0>] phy_power_off+0x1c/0xb8
[ 204.678710]
and this task is already holding:
(&(&musb->lock)->rlock){-.-...}, at: [<bf3a482c>]
musb_gadget_stop+0x24/0xec [musb_hdrc]
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&musb->lock)->rlock){-.-...} -> (&phy->mutex){+.+.+.}
...
This is because some glue layers expect musb_platform_enable/disable
to be called with spinlock held, and 2430 glue layer has USB PHY on
the I2C bus using a mutex.
We could fix the glue layers to take the spinlock, but we still have
a problem of musb_plaform_enable/disable being called in an unbalanced
manner. So that would still lead into USB PHY enable/disable related
problems for omap2430 glue layer.
While it makes sense to only enable USB PHY when needed from PM point
of view, in this case we just can't do it yet without breaking things.
So let's just revert phy_enable/disable related changes instead and
reconsider this after we have fixed musb_platform_enable/disable to
be balanced.
Fixes: a83e17d0f7 ("usb: musb: Improve PM runtime and phy handling for 2430 glue layer")
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
d8e5f0eca1