e386a527fc
Using mlxsw driver, the configurations are offloaded just in case that there is a physical port which is enslaved to the virtual device (e.g., to a bridge). In 'mirror_gre_bridge_1q_lag' test, the bridge gets an address and route before there are ports in the bridge. It means that these configurations are not offloaded. Till now the test passes with mlxsw driver even that the RIF of the bridge is not in the hardware, because the ARP packets are trapped in layer 2 and also mirrored, so there is no real need of the RIF in hardware. The previous patch changed the traps 'ARP_REQUEST' and 'ARP_RESPONSE' to be done at layer 3 instead of layer 2. With this change the ARP packets are not trapped during the test, as the RIF is not in the hardware because of the order of configurations. Reorder the configurations to make them to be offloaded, then the test will pass with the change of the traps. Signed-off-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
.gitignore | ||
bridge_igmp.sh | ||
bridge_locked_port.sh | ||
bridge_mdb.sh | ||
bridge_mld.sh | ||
bridge_port_isolation.sh | ||
bridge_sticky_fdb.sh | ||
bridge_vlan_aware.sh | ||
bridge_vlan_mcast.sh | ||
bridge_vlan_unaware.sh | ||
config | ||
custom_multipath_hash.sh | ||
devlink_lib.sh | ||
dual_vxlan_bridge.sh | ||
ethtool_extended_state.sh | ||
ethtool_lib.sh | ||
ethtool.sh | ||
fib_offload_lib.sh | ||
forwarding.config.sample | ||
gre_custom_multipath_hash.sh | ||
gre_inner_v4_multipath.sh | ||
gre_inner_v6_multipath.sh | ||
gre_multipath_nh_res.sh | ||
gre_multipath_nh.sh | ||
gre_multipath.sh | ||
hw_stats_l3_gre.sh | ||
hw_stats_l3.sh | ||
ip6_forward_instats_vrf.sh | ||
ip6gre_custom_multipath_hash.sh | ||
ip6gre_flat_key.sh | ||
ip6gre_flat_keys.sh | ||
ip6gre_flat.sh | ||
ip6gre_hier_key.sh | ||
ip6gre_hier_keys.sh | ||
ip6gre_hier.sh | ||
ip6gre_inner_v4_multipath.sh | ||
ip6gre_inner_v6_multipath.sh | ||
ip6gre_lib.sh | ||
ipip_flat_gre_key.sh | ||
ipip_flat_gre_keys.sh | ||
ipip_flat_gre.sh | ||
ipip_hier_gre_key.sh | ||
ipip_hier_gre_keys.sh | ||
ipip_hier_gre.sh | ||
ipip_lib.sh | ||
lib.sh | ||
local_termination.sh | ||
loopback.sh | ||
Makefile | ||
mirror_gre_bound.sh | ||
mirror_gre_bridge_1d_vlan.sh | ||
mirror_gre_bridge_1d.sh | ||
mirror_gre_bridge_1q_lag.sh | ||
mirror_gre_bridge_1q.sh | ||
mirror_gre_changes.sh | ||
mirror_gre_flower.sh | ||
mirror_gre_lag_lacp.sh | ||
mirror_gre_lib.sh | ||
mirror_gre_neigh.sh | ||
mirror_gre_nh.sh | ||
mirror_gre_topo_lib.sh | ||
mirror_gre_vlan_bridge_1q.sh | ||
mirror_gre_vlan.sh | ||
mirror_gre.sh | ||
mirror_lib.sh | ||
mirror_topo_lib.sh | ||
mirror_vlan.sh | ||
no_forwarding.sh | ||
pedit_dsfield.sh | ||
pedit_ip.sh | ||
pedit_l4port.sh | ||
q_in_vni_ipv6.sh | ||
q_in_vni.sh | ||
README | ||
router_bridge_vlan.sh | ||
router_bridge.sh | ||
router_broadcast.sh | ||
router_mpath_nh_res.sh | ||
router_mpath_nh.sh | ||
router_multicast.sh | ||
router_multipath.sh | ||
router_nh.sh | ||
router_vid_1.sh | ||
router.sh | ||
sch_ets_core.sh | ||
sch_ets_tests.sh | ||
sch_ets.sh | ||
sch_red.sh | ||
sch_tbf_core.sh | ||
sch_tbf_ets.sh | ||
sch_tbf_etsprio.sh | ||
sch_tbf_prio.sh | ||
sch_tbf_root.sh | ||
skbedit_priority.sh | ||
tc_actions.sh | ||
tc_chains.sh | ||
tc_common.sh | ||
tc_flower_router.sh | ||
tc_flower.sh | ||
tc_mpls_l2vpn.sh | ||
tc_police.sh | ||
tc_shblocks.sh | ||
tc_vlan_modify.sh | ||
tsn_lib.sh | ||
vxlan_asymmetric_ipv6.sh | ||
vxlan_asymmetric.sh | ||
vxlan_bridge_1d_ipv6.sh | ||
vxlan_bridge_1d_port_8472_ipv6.sh | ||
vxlan_bridge_1d_port_8472.sh | ||
vxlan_bridge_1d.sh | ||
vxlan_bridge_1q_ipv6.sh | ||
vxlan_bridge_1q_port_8472_ipv6.sh | ||
vxlan_bridge_1q_port_8472.sh | ||
vxlan_bridge_1q.sh | ||
vxlan_symmetric_ipv6.sh | ||
vxlan_symmetric.sh |
Motivation ========== One of the nice things about network namespaces is that they allow one to easily create and test complex environments. Unfortunately, these namespaces can not be used with actual switching ASICs, as their ports can not be migrated to other network namespaces (NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL) and most of them probably do not support the L1-separation provided by namespaces. However, a similar kind of flexibility can be achieved by using VRFs and by looping the switch ports together. For example: br0 + vrf-h1 | vrf-h2 + +---+----+ + | | | | 192.0.2.1/24 + + + + 192.0.2.2/24 swp1 swp2 swp3 swp4 + + + + | | | | +--------+ +--------+ The VRFs act as lightweight namespaces representing hosts connected to the switch. This approach for testing switch ASICs has several advantages over the traditional method that requires multiple physical machines, to name a few: 1. Only the device under test (DUT) is being tested without noise from other system. 2. Ability to easily provision complex topologies. Testing bridging between 4-ports LAGs or 8-way ECMP requires many physical links that are not always available. With the VRF-based approach one merely needs to loopback more ports. These tests are written with switch ASICs in mind, but they can be run on any Linux box using veth pairs to emulate physical loopbacks. Guidelines for Writing Tests ============================ o Where possible, reuse an existing topology for different tests instead of recreating the same topology. o Tests that use anything but the most trivial topologies should include an ASCII art showing the topology. o Where possible, IPv6 and IPv4 addresses shall conform to RFC 3849 and RFC 5737, respectively. o Where possible, tests shall be written so that they can be reused by multiple topologies and added to lib.sh. o Checks shall be added to lib.sh for any external dependencies. o Code shall be checked using ShellCheck [1] prior to submission. 1. https://www.shellcheck.net/