IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Nothing cares about the -1 "mark as interrupt" in the errorcode of
exception entries. It's only used to fill the error code when a signal is
delivered, but this is already inconsistent vs. 64 bit as there all
exceptions which do not have an error code set it to 0. So if 32 bit
applications would care about this, then they would have noticed more than
a decade ago.
Just use 0 for all excpetions which do not have an errorcode consistently.
This does neither break /proc/$PID/syscall because this interface examines
the error code / syscall number which is on the stack and that is set to -1
(no syscall) in common_exception unconditionally for all exceptions. The
push in the entry stub is just there to fill the hardware error code slot
on the stack for consistency of the stack layout.
A transient observation of 0 is possible, but that's true for the other
exceptions which use 0 already as well and that interface is an unreliable
snapshot of dubious correctness anyway.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87mu94m7ky.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de
e441a2ae0e