Glauber Costa 1398eee082 net: decrement memcg jump label when limit, not usage, is changed
The logic of the current code is that whenever we destroy
a cgroup that had its limit set (set meaning different than
maximum), we should decrement the jump_label counter.
Otherwise we assume it was never incremented.

But what the code actually does is test for RES_USAGE
instead of RES_LIMIT. Usage being different than maximum
is likely to be true most of the time.

The effect of this is that the key must become negative,
and since the jump_label test says:

        !!atomic_read(&key->enabled);

we'll have jump_labels still on when no one else is
using this functionality.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
CC: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2012-01-12 12:27:59 -08:00
..
2011-12-12 19:04:11 -05:00
2011-11-12 18:13:32 -05:00
2011-12-28 15:06:58 -05:00
2011-04-22 11:04:14 -07:00
2011-10-13 16:05:07 -04:00
2011-10-19 03:10:46 -04:00
2011-12-11 18:25:16 -05:00
2011-12-11 18:25:16 -05:00
2011-12-12 19:04:10 -05:00
2011-11-18 14:38:59 -05:00
2011-12-12 19:04:11 -05:00
2011-03-31 11:26:23 -03:00
2011-03-31 11:26:23 -03:00
2011-12-12 19:04:11 -05:00
2011-12-11 18:25:16 -05:00
2011-12-09 14:14:08 -05:00
2010-07-12 12:57:54 -07:00