IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Protection of __nfs4_state_shutdown() with nfs4_lock_state() looks redundant.
This function is called by the last NFSd thread on it's exit and state lock
protects actually two functions (del_recall_lru is protected by recall_lock):
1) nfsd4_client_tracking_exit
2) __nfs4_state_shutdown_net
"nfsd4_client_tracking_exit" doesn't require state lock protection, because it's
state can be modified only by tracker callbacks.
Here a re they:
1) create: is called only from nfsd4_proc_compound.
2) remove: is called from either nfsd4_proc_compound or nfs4_laundromat.
3) check: is called only from nfsd4_proc_compound.
4) grace_done; called only from nfs4_laundromat.
nfsd4_proc_compound is called onll by NFSd kthread, which is exiting right
now.
nfs4_laundromat is called by laundry_wq. But laundromat_work was canceled
already.
"__nfs4_state_shutdown_net" also doesn't require state lock protection,
because all NFSd kthreads are dead, and no race can happen with NFSd start,
because "nfsd_up" flag is still set.
Moreover, all Nfsd shutdown is protected with global nfsd_mutex.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
ec28e02ca5