IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Jonathan Heathcote reported a regression caused by blamed commit
on aarch64 architecture.
x86 happens to have irq-safe __this_cpu_add_return()
and __this_cpu_sub(), but this is not generic.
I think my confusion came from "struct sock" argument,
because these helpers are called with a locked socket.
But the memory accounting is per-proto (and per-cpu after
the blamed commit). We might cleanup these helpers later
to directly accept a "struct proto *proto" argument.
Switch to this_cpu_add_return() and this_cpu_xchg()
operations, and get rid of preempt_disable()/preempt_enable() pairs.
Fast path becomes a bit faster as a result :)
Many thanks to Jonathan Heathcote for his awesome report and
investigations.
Fixes: 3cd3399dd7a8 ("net: implement per-cpu reserves for memory_allocated")
Reported-by: Jonathan Heathcote <jonathan.heathcote@bbc.co.uk>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/VI1PR01MB42407D7947B2EA448F1E04EFD10D2@VI1PR01MB4240.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com/
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240421175248.1692552-1-edumazet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
3584718cf2