IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
My previous patch "Btrfs: fix scrub race leading to use-after-free"
introduced the possibility to sleep in an atomic context, which happens
when the scrub_lock mutex is held at the time scrub_pending_bio_dec()
is called - this function can be called under an atomic context.
Chris ran into this in a debug kernel which gave the following trace:
[ 1928.950319] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:621
[ 1928.967334] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 149670, name: fsstress
[ 1928.981324] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[ 1928.989244] CPU: 24 PID: 149670 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G W 3.19.0-rc7-mason+ #41
[ 1929.006418] Hardware name: ZTSYSTEMS Echo Ridge T4 /A9DRPF-10D, BIOS 1.07 05/10/2012
[ 1929.022207] ffffffff81a22cf8 ffff881076e03b78 ffffffff816b8dd9 ffff881076e03b78
[ 1929.037267] ffff880d8e828710 ffff881076e03ba8 ffffffff810856c4 ffff881076e03bc8
[ 1929.052315] 0000000000000000 000000000000026d ffffffff81a22cf8 ffff881076e03bd8
[ 1929.067381] Call Trace:
[ 1929.072344] <IRQ> [<ffffffff816b8dd9>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x6e
[ 1929.083968] [<ffffffff810856c4>] ___might_sleep+0x174/0x230
[ 1929.095352] [<ffffffff810857d2>] __might_sleep+0x52/0x90
[ 1929.106223] [<ffffffff816bb68f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2f/0x3b0
[ 1929.117951] [<ffffffff810ab37d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[ 1929.129708] [<ffffffffa05dc838>] scrub_pending_bio_dec+0x38/0x70 [btrfs]
[ 1929.143370] [<ffffffffa05dd0e0>] scrub_parity_bio_endio+0x50/0x70 [btrfs]
[ 1929.157191] [<ffffffff812fa603>] bio_endio+0x53/0xa0
[ 1929.167382] [<ffffffffa05f96bc>] rbio_orig_end_io+0x7c/0xa0 [btrfs]
[ 1929.180161] [<ffffffffa05f97ba>] raid_write_parity_end_io+0x5a/0x80 [btrfs]
[ 1929.194318] [<ffffffff812fa603>] bio_endio+0x53/0xa0
[ 1929.204496] [<ffffffff8130401b>] blk_update_request+0x1eb/0x450
[ 1929.216569] [<ffffffff81096e58>] ? trigger_load_balance+0x78/0x500
[ 1929.229176] [<ffffffff8144c74d>] scsi_end_request+0x3d/0x1f0
[ 1929.240740] [<ffffffff8144ccac>] scsi_io_completion+0xac/0x5b0
[ 1929.252654] [<ffffffff81441c50>] scsi_finish_command+0xf0/0x150
[ 1929.264725] [<ffffffff8144d317>] scsi_softirq_done+0x147/0x170
[ 1929.276635] [<ffffffff8130ace6>] blk_done_softirq+0x86/0xa0
[ 1929.288014] [<ffffffff8105d92e>] __do_softirq+0xde/0x600
[ 1929.298885] [<ffffffff8105df6d>] irq_exit+0xbd/0xd0
(...)
Fix this by using a reference count on the scrub context structure
instead of locking the scrub_lock mutex.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
f55985f4dd