Ido Schimmel says: ==================== ipv6: Align nexthop behaviour with IPv4 This set tries to eliminate some differences between IPv4's and IPv6's treatment of nexthops. These differences are most likely a side effect of IPv6's data structures (specifically 'rt6_info') that incorporate both the route and the nexthop and the late addition of ECMP support in commit 51ebd3181572 ("ipv6: add support of equal cost multipath (ECMP)"). IPv4 and IPv6 do not react the same to certain netdev events. For example, upon carrier change affected IPv4 nexthops are marked using the RTNH_F_LINKDOWN flag and the nexthop group is rebalanced accordingly. IPv6 on the other hand, does nothing which forces us to perform a carrier check during route lookup and dump. This makes it difficult to introduce features such as non-equal-cost multipath that are built on top of this set [1]. In addition, when a netdev is put administratively down IPv4 nexthops are marked using the RTNH_F_DEAD flag, whereas IPv6 simply flushes all the routes using these nexthops. To be consistent with IPv4, multipath routes should only be flushed when all nexthops in the group are considered dead. The first 12 patches introduce non-functional changes that store the RTNH_F_DEAD and RTNH_F_LINKDOWN flags in IPv6 routes based on netdev events, in a similar fashion to IPv4. This allows us to remove the carrier check performed during route lookup and dump. The next three patches make sure we only flush a multipath route when all of its nexthops are dead. Last three patches add test cases for IPv4/IPv6 FIB. These verify that both address families react similarly to netdev events. Finally, this series also serves as a good first step towards David Ahern's goal of treating nexthops as standalone objects [2], as it makes the code more in line with IPv4 where the nexthop and the nexthop group are separate objects from the route itself. 1. https://github.com/idosch/linux/tree/ipv6-nexthops 2. http://vger.kernel.org/netconf2017_files/nexthop-objects.pdf Changes since RFC (feedback from David Ahern): * Remove redundant declaration of rt6_ifdown() in patch 4 and adjust comment referencing it accordingly * Drop patch to flush multipath routes upon NETDEV_UNREGISTER. Reword cover letter accordingly * Use a temporary variable to make code more readable in patch 15 ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
…
Linux kernel ============ This file was moved to Documentation/admin-guide/README.rst Please notice that there are several guides for kernel developers and users. These guides can be rendered in a number of formats, like HTML and PDF. In order to build the documentation, use ``make htmldocs`` or ``make pdfdocs``. There are various text files in the Documentation/ subdirectory, several of them using the Restructured Text markup notation. See Documentation/00-INDEX for a list of what is contained in each file. Please read the Documentation/process/changes.rst file, as it contains the requirements for building and running the kernel, and information about the problems which may result by upgrading your kernel.
Description
Languages
C
97.6%
Assembly
1%
Shell
0.5%
Python
0.3%
Makefile
0.3%