IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
commit c282222a45cb9503cbfbebfdb60491f06ae84b49 upstream.
Dmitry reports following splat:
INFO: trying to register non-static key.
the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
turning off the locking correctness validator.
CPU: 0 PID: 13059 Comm: syz-executor1 Not tainted 4.10.0-rc7-next-20170207 #1
[..]
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:304 [inline]
xfrm_policy_flush+0x32/0x470 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:963
xfrm_policy_fini+0xbf/0x560 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3041
xfrm_net_init+0x79f/0x9e0 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3091
ops_init+0x10a/0x530 net/core/net_namespace.c:115
setup_net+0x2ed/0x690 net/core/net_namespace.c:291
copy_net_ns+0x26c/0x530 net/core/net_namespace.c:396
create_new_namespaces+0x409/0x860 kernel/nsproxy.c:106
unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0xae/0x1e0 kernel/nsproxy.c:205
SYSC_unshare kernel/fork.c:2281 [inline]
Problem is that when we get error during xfrm_net_init we will call
xfrm_policy_fini which will acquire xfrm_policy_lock before it was
initialized. Just move it around so locks get set up first.
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Fixes: 283bc9f35bbbcb0e9 ("xfrm: Namespacify xfrm state/policy locks")
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
f68a09c794