mkimage-profiles/lib/boot.mk

ifndef MKIMAGE_PROFILES
$(error this makefile is designed to be included in toplevel one)
endif

ifeq (distro,$(IMAGE_CLASS))

# install media bootloader
boot/iso:
ifeq (,$(filter-out i586 x86_64,$(ARCH)))
	@$(call try,BOOTLOADER,isolinux)
endif
ifeq (,$(filter-out aarch64 riscv64,$(ARCH)))
	@$(call try,BOOTLOADER,efiboot)
endif
ifeq (,$(filter-out e2k%,$(ARCH)))
	@$(call try,BOOTLOADER,e2kboot)
	@$(call set,IMAGE_PACKTYPE,isodata)
endif
ifeq (,$(filter-out ppc64le,$(ARCH)))
	@$(call try,BOOTLOADER,ieee1275boot)
endif
	@$(call try,IMAGE_PACKTYPE,boot)

endif
boot.mk: factor out boot/% from distro.mk Yes these bits are related to distro/ prefixed images still the overgeneralization in distro.mk didn't pay off but rather hid a bug with the only boot/isolinux in use having no dependency on use/syslinux (which is required). Maybe this will get revisited when we have other kinds of bootable images with other bootloaders (vm/ ones care for themselves as of today). 2015-03-28 15:20:34 +03:00			`ifndef MKIMAGE_PROFILES`
			`$(error this makefile is designed to be included in toplevel one)`
			`endif`

			`ifeq (distro,$(IMAGE_CLASS))`
rework isoboot support beyond x86 Every .iso was assumed to be bootable since the very beginning[], and isoboot images were deemed to be x86 isolinux ones; this didn't change with basic ppc/armh support as I never ran into hardware that would _boot_ those ISOs, not only run the code, and it was only e2k isodata project that finally forced this refactoring. It's still not perfect: pack and syslinux features still end up somewhat interwoven, and too much places care for architecture the image is being built for (instead of archdep features tossing their appropriate bits and pieces in). Should help: - any-arch regarding isodata images; - {x86,aarch64}/efi by decoupling isoboot and isolinux; - ppc{,64} as introducing yaboot support will be easier now; - mipsel{,64} too, hopefully. I knew of school addon images baked with mkimage-profiles-desktop but postponed and then neglected the whole problem for years... 2018-07-25 15:40:56 +03:00
boot.mk, grub, syslinux: Add the ability to override BOOTLOADER More than one BOOTLOADER may be available for the same architecture. Set IMAGE_PACKTYPE in boot/iso, there is no point in duplicating in different features. Closes ALT bug 39786. 2021-03-16 13:49:51 +03:00			`# install media bootloader`
			`boot/iso:`
boot.mk, build-distro: handle e2k It needs (and has) no isolinux in the first place; this is also the situation with most or all non-x86 arches, the code should probably reflect that. 2018-05-10 11:31:33 +03:00			`ifeq (,$(filter-out i586 x86_64,$(ARCH)))`
boot.mk, grub, syslinux: Add the ability to override BOOTLOADER More than one BOOTLOADER may be available for the same architecture. Set IMAGE_PACKTYPE in boot/iso, there is no point in duplicating in different features. Closes ALT bug 39786. 2021-03-16 13:49:51 +03:00			`@$(call try,BOOTLOADER,isolinux)`
boot.mk: factor out boot/% from distro.mk Yes these bits are related to distro/ prefixed images still the overgeneralization in distro.mk didn't pay off but rather hid a bug with the only boot/isolinux in use having no dependency on use/syslinux (which is required). Maybe this will get revisited when we have other kinds of bootable images with other bootloaders (vm/ ones care for themselves as of today). 2015-03-28 15:20:34 +03:00			`endif`
boot.mk, efi, grub: Add support riscv64 For riscv64 available grub-efi. Needed added support for mkimage (mki-copy-efiboot-chrooted). 2021-03-16 17:12:05 +03:00			`ifeq (,$(filter-out aarch64 riscv64,$(ARCH)))`
boot.mk, grub, syslinux: Add the ability to override BOOTLOADER More than one BOOTLOADER may be available for the same architecture. Set IMAGE_PACKTYPE in boot/iso, there is no point in duplicating in different features. Closes ALT bug 39786. 2021-03-16 13:49:51 +03:00			`@$(call try,BOOTLOADER,efiboot)`
90-build-distro.mk, boot.mk, syslinux: add ARM64 EFI support for distro targets 2019-07-10 08:44:40 +03:00			`endif`
boot.mk, build-distro: handle e2k It needs (and has) no isolinux in the first place; this is also the situation with most or all non-x86 arches, the code should probably reflect that. 2018-05-10 11:31:33 +03:00			`ifeq (,$(filter-out e2k%,$(ARCH)))`
lib/boot.mk: Fix BOOTLOADER for e2k 2021-04-12 20:04:58 +03:00			`@$(call try,BOOTLOADER,e2kboot)`
lib/boot.mk: Set IMAGE_PACKTYPE to isodata for e2k 2021-04-15 09:19:08 +03:00			`@$(call set,IMAGE_PACKTYPE,isodata)`
boot.mk, build-distro: handle e2k It needs (and has) no isolinux in the first place; this is also the situation with most or all non-x86 arches, the code should probably reflect that. 2018-05-10 11:31:33 +03:00			`endif`
Use ieee1275boot as bootloader on ppc64le ieee1275boot bootloader support was added in mkimage 0.2.27. 2019-07-09 14:54:20 +03:00			`ifeq (,$(filter-out ppc64le,$(ARCH)))`
boot.mk, grub, syslinux: Add the ability to override BOOTLOADER More than one BOOTLOADER may be available for the same architecture. Set IMAGE_PACKTYPE in boot/iso, there is no point in duplicating in different features. Closes ALT bug 39786. 2021-03-16 13:49:51 +03:00			`@$(call try,BOOTLOADER,ieee1275boot)`
Use ieee1275boot as bootloader on ppc64le ieee1275boot bootloader support was added in mkimage 0.2.27. 2019-07-09 14:54:20 +03:00			`endif`
lib/boot.mk: Set IMAGE_PACKTYPE to isodata for e2k 2021-04-15 09:19:08 +03:00			`@$(call try,IMAGE_PACKTYPE,boot)`
Use ieee1275boot as bootloader on ppc64le ieee1275boot bootloader support was added in mkimage 0.2.27. 2019-07-09 14:54:20 +03:00
boot.mk, build-distro: handle e2k It needs (and has) no isolinux in the first place; this is also the situation with most or all non-x86 arches, the code should probably reflect that. 2018-05-10 11:31:33 +03:00			`endif`