mkimage-profiles/features.in/build-ve/config.mk

# hooked from ../../lib/sugar.mk
use/build-ve:
	@$(call add_feature)
cleanup dependency dups Several targets were used in a duplicated way that made no harm but no sense either. 2011-12-13 20:14:36 +04:00			`# hooked from ../../lib/sugar.mk`
official {distro,ve}/* support This is quite a large-scale change since mkimage-profiles got used to baking distributions over the last year, and virtual environments are quite different, so e.g. image.in/Makefile had to be split in two with the main part of it moved into features.in/iso/lib/. Short overview: - features.in/Makefile: lib/ support (supporting VE images requires dynamic modifications to image.in/Makefile before starting the build; the most natural way to achieve that seems to use features mechanism along with makefile include dir) - packaging format related part moved into features.in/pack (should be better prepared for diversity either) - features.in/iso renamed to features.in/build-distro - features.in/ve renamed to features.in/build-ve + NB: these could not be merged as e.g. features.in/build due to completely different script hooks - lib/image.mk renamed to lib/build.mk - image, config, log postprocessing moved downstream - added a sort of a topping in the form of lib/sugar.mk - assorted style fixups (like ifeq usage) - clean.mk: reliability fix (the problem was observed by Oleg Ivanov and me too but finally it did get the attention quantum) - reviewed, updated and extended docs + QUICKSTART: should be[come] a step-by-step guide (thanks Leo-sp50 for prodiving feedback) 2011-10-06 12:46:31 +04:00			`use/build-ve:`
introduced add_feature function The features might get copy-pasted (or even copied-and-pruned) when initialized; there's an unneccessary duplication of the function name in the line adding it to FEATURES list, thus prone to being forgotten and causing some havoc later on. It was wrong in the first place but tackling this with some double-colon rules ran into terminality issues, and further tortures were considered unneccessary. The current solution isn't perfect (no completely transparent function name registration upon corresponding target being called) but at least it is an improvement... 2011-11-16 19:58:42 +04:00			`@$(call add_feature)`