IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This is a controversial feature right from the start,
but keeping jeos alive on non-x86 (that is, catching
every case when a removed removed package would bring
something critical along with it) is somewhat harder
so just skip this part there for now.
The problem at hand was that an installer component
of a "DVD class" image does use/cleanup/installer
while installable LiveCD component gets broken by that
(livecd-install -> installer-scripts-remount-stage2
which gets removed as installer-*).
Split those.
This is based on distro/regular-jeos but torn into two
and somewhat updated for sisyphus-going-to-bring-p8:
1) libcap-ng is now required by util-linux;
2) bridge-utils might be needed for subsequent images.
The installer feature added is a trivial wrapper around
apt-cache nodeps to uninstall the ^lib packages that have
no more dependencies upon those when the temporarily
installed packages like alterator-browser-qt get removed.
A few more leftover libraries tend to hang around after
purging extra alterator packages that have fired already
during installation stage3; this change might hurt someone,
please do notify if that is the case (OTOH one isn't forced
to use it or to inherit intermediate targets that do so).
The features might get copy-pasted (or even copied-and-pruned)
when initialized; there's an unneccessary duplication of the
function name in the line adding it to FEATURES list, thus
prone to being forgotten and causing some havoc later on.
It was wrong in the first place but tackling this with some
double-colon rules ran into terminality issues, and further
tortures were considered unneccessary.
The current solution isn't perfect (no completely transparent
function name registration upon corresponding target being called)
but at least it is an improvement...
This is a sort of anti-feature which removes and not builds;
still with mkimage-profiles' approach we can at least build
up the removal procedures as well.
It's what triggered the tagged scripts, BTW.
