IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This is necessary to prevent unintentional assignment of rEFInd
as EFI_BOOTLOADER.
I also want to hope that memtest86.efi can be made to work from
grub-efi in the future.
Signed UEFI loader not required for aarch64.
NB: i586 images don't need UEFI SB either
and 32-bit shim is used for x86_64 images
along with proper 64-bit one.
THE_* variables serve user needs while shim belongs
to either SYSTEM or COMMON level packages, not needed
explicitly for stage1 though (mkimage will put it there
when needed) so it's just COMMON.
This change is done to reduce ambiguity in some cases;
the previous intention has been to ease navigation when
staying in a particular directory, now it's been changed
in favour of convenient toplevel `git grep' in fact.
Both variants have their pros and cons, I just find myself
leaning to this one by now hence the commit. Feel free to
provide constructive criticism :)
Some path-related bitrot has also been fixed while at that.
I've noted that this bit of code should be fixed up
before pushing but managed to overlook that in the end :(
mkimage version bump is due to the somewhat changed layout
of EFI packages and binaries within those (linked message in Russian):
http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel-distro/2013-December/001283.html
We chose to provide methods to sign packages but to avoid
signing these by default (with some arbitrary test keys)
the signatures are being added *after* the build by means
of rpmrebuild-pesign; all of this is made significantly
more complicated if there are separate -signed subpackages.
So these are being dropped in the packages; account for that.
This feature is more generally applicable indeed;
might result in duplication due to the installer
components adding "efivars" independently but that
is to be sorted out later in those components:
- check whether it's added already sometime soon;
- maybe stop adding that at some point in the future.
install2 and rescue roots still need this too though.
It's possible that use/efi/signed target has fired already
at the time when use/efi/shell is invoked; shouldn't clobber
the signed shell with unsigned one.
It's aimed at providing UEFI shell implementation which is very
useful for repairs and debug; if the "signed" mode is requested
then the signed variant is used either.
Please note that there are two distinct uses:
- a shell lying around on a filesystem to be copied by hand;
- a shell available in EFI part of boot media to be launched
by firmware's or standalone boot manager (e.g. refind).
There's a possibility to run into IA32 EFI but that's rather
uninteresting hardware (ancient Xeon servers and <s>outdated</s>
early Intel Mac laptops). Just drop it on the floor.
As x86_64 UEFI support would result in "2D hybrid(r)(tm)" image
which boots with all combinations of BIOS/UEFI by CD|DVD/Flash
(or at least should boot), some downgrace seems due: use/efi will
turn use/isohybrid on non-x86_64 -- which will require further
tweaks on PPC/ARM some day.
The initial approach required some quite involved postprocessing
as described in http://www.altlinux.org/UEFI#HOWTO; after having
ironed out the kinks so that initial EFI support could be merged
into mkimage proper we're better off just using it, eh?
EFI/UEFI is mostly about partitioning and bootloader setup,
at least from a distribution's point of view; so the
appropriate tools should be handy and firmware interface
module should not be exterminated from installer images
but get autoloaded instead.
Please note that while there exists 32-bit x86 EFI
we don't bother with it at the time being: it's relevant
to some irrelevant Xeon systems as well as for the older
Intel Macs (<2008) that are long out of fashion anyways.
That is, initially we deal with x86_64 EFI only.
