6f452182fd
This function's got its argument order chosen for "aesthetical" reason of $(2) following $(1) in the macros but the logical order is exactly the opposite: we care for kernel flavour much more than for module set (which is dependent upon it). So while silent dropout of kernel-image if KFLAVOURS is set but KMODULES is empty could be fixed by testing for $(2) only, it looks like a good time to fix this discrepancy altogether.
7 lines
192 B
Makefile
7 lines
192 B
Makefile
# step 4: build the distribution image
|
|
# take care for kernel bits
|
|
|
|
DOT_BASE += $(call kpackages, \
|
|
$(KFLAVOURS), \
|
|
$(THE_KMODULES) $(BASE_KMODULES) $(BASE_KMODULES_REGEXP))
|