2016-12-09 01:31:20 +03:00
#!/bin/bash
set -xeuo pipefail
tests/compose: Target FCOS 31, move off of PAPR
Again, a lot going on here, but essentially, we adapt the compose tests
to run either privileged or fully unprivileged via supermin, just like
cosa.
I actually got more than halfway through this initially using `cosa
build` directly for testing. But in the end, we simply need more
flexibility than that. We want to be able to manipulate exactly how
rpm-ostree is called, and cosa is very opinionated about this (and may
also change from under us in the future).
(Another big difference for example is that cosa doesn't care about
non-unified mode, whereas we *need* to have coverage for this until we
fully kill it.)
Really, the most important bit we want from there is the
unprivileged-via-supermin bits. So we copy and adapt that here. One
obvious improvement then is sharing this code more easily (e.g. a
`cosa runasroot` or something?)
However, we still use the FCOS manifest (frozen at a specific tag). It's
a realistic example, and because of the lockfiles and pool, we get good
reproducibility.
2019-12-22 01:42:09 +03:00
dn = $( cd " $( dirname " $0 " ) " && pwd )
# shellcheck source=libcomposetest.sh
. " ${ dn } /libcomposetest.sh "
2016-12-09 01:31:20 +03:00
tests/compose: Target FCOS 31, move off of PAPR
Again, a lot going on here, but essentially, we adapt the compose tests
to run either privileged or fully unprivileged via supermin, just like
cosa.
I actually got more than halfway through this initially using `cosa
build` directly for testing. But in the end, we simply need more
flexibility than that. We want to be able to manipulate exactly how
rpm-ostree is called, and cosa is very opinionated about this (and may
also change from under us in the future).
(Another big difference for example is that cosa doesn't care about
non-unified mode, whereas we *need* to have coverage for this until we
fully kill it.)
Really, the most important bit we want from there is the
unprivileged-via-supermin bits. So we copy and adapt that here. One
obvious improvement then is sharing this code more easily (e.g. a
`cosa runasroot` or something?)
However, we still use the FCOS manifest (frozen at a specific tag). It's
a realistic example, and because of the lockfiles and pool, we get good
reproducibility.
2019-12-22 01:42:09 +03:00
treefile_set "install-langs" '["fr", "fr_FR", "en_US"]'
treefile_set "postprocess-script" " ' $PWD /lang-test.sh' "
2016-12-09 01:31:20 +03:00
cat > lang-test.sh << EOF
#!/bin/bash
set -xeuo pipefail
env LANG = fr_FR.UTF-8 date -ud @0 & > /etc/lang-test.date.txt
( env LANG = fr_FR.UTF-8 touch || :) & > /etc/lang-test.touch.txt
env LANG = de_DE.UTF-8 date -ud @0 & > /etc/lang-test.de.date.txt
( env LANG = de_DE.UTF-8 touch || :) & > /etc/lang-test.de.touch.txt
EOF
chmod a+x lang-test.sh
runcompose
echo "ok compose"
tests/compose: Target FCOS 31, move off of PAPR
Again, a lot going on here, but essentially, we adapt the compose tests
to run either privileged or fully unprivileged via supermin, just like
cosa.
I actually got more than halfway through this initially using `cosa
build` directly for testing. But in the end, we simply need more
flexibility than that. We want to be able to manipulate exactly how
rpm-ostree is called, and cosa is very opinionated about this (and may
also change from under us in the future).
(Another big difference for example is that cosa doesn't care about
non-unified mode, whereas we *need* to have coverage for this until we
fully kill it.)
Really, the most important bit we want from there is the
unprivileged-via-supermin bits. So we copy and adapt that here. One
obvious improvement then is sharing this code more easily (e.g. a
`cosa runasroot` or something?)
However, we still use the FCOS manifest (frozen at a specific tag). It's
a realistic example, and because of the lockfiles and pool, we get good
reproducibility.
2019-12-22 01:42:09 +03:00
ostree --repo= ${ repo } cat ${ treeref } /usr/etc/lang-test.date.txt > out.txt
2016-12-09 01:31:20 +03:00
assert_file_has_content out.txt 'jeu\. janv\. 1 00:00:00 UTC 1970'
tests/compose: Target FCOS 31, move off of PAPR
Again, a lot going on here, but essentially, we adapt the compose tests
to run either privileged or fully unprivileged via supermin, just like
cosa.
I actually got more than halfway through this initially using `cosa
build` directly for testing. But in the end, we simply need more
flexibility than that. We want to be able to manipulate exactly how
rpm-ostree is called, and cosa is very opinionated about this (and may
also change from under us in the future).
(Another big difference for example is that cosa doesn't care about
non-unified mode, whereas we *need* to have coverage for this until we
fully kill it.)
Really, the most important bit we want from there is the
unprivileged-via-supermin bits. So we copy and adapt that here. One
obvious improvement then is sharing this code more easily (e.g. a
`cosa runasroot` or something?)
However, we still use the FCOS manifest (frozen at a specific tag). It's
a realistic example, and because of the lockfiles and pool, we get good
reproducibility.
2019-12-22 01:42:09 +03:00
ostree --repo= ${ repo } cat ${ treeref } /usr/etc/lang-test.touch.txt > out.txt
2016-12-09 01:31:20 +03:00
assert_file_has_content out.txt 'opérande de fichier manquant'
tests/compose: Target FCOS 31, move off of PAPR
Again, a lot going on here, but essentially, we adapt the compose tests
to run either privileged or fully unprivileged via supermin, just like
cosa.
I actually got more than halfway through this initially using `cosa
build` directly for testing. But in the end, we simply need more
flexibility than that. We want to be able to manipulate exactly how
rpm-ostree is called, and cosa is very opinionated about this (and may
also change from under us in the future).
(Another big difference for example is that cosa doesn't care about
non-unified mode, whereas we *need* to have coverage for this until we
fully kill it.)
Really, the most important bit we want from there is the
unprivileged-via-supermin bits. So we copy and adapt that here. One
obvious improvement then is sharing this code more easily (e.g. a
`cosa runasroot` or something?)
However, we still use the FCOS manifest (frozen at a specific tag). It's
a realistic example, and because of the lockfiles and pool, we get good
reproducibility.
2019-12-22 01:42:09 +03:00
# XXX: this test doesn't currently work since glibc no longer obeys install-langs:
# https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/issues/194#issuecomment-556365516
2016-12-09 01:31:20 +03:00
tests/compose: Target FCOS 31, move off of PAPR
Again, a lot going on here, but essentially, we adapt the compose tests
to run either privileged or fully unprivileged via supermin, just like
cosa.
I actually got more than halfway through this initially using `cosa
build` directly for testing. But in the end, we simply need more
flexibility than that. We want to be able to manipulate exactly how
rpm-ostree is called, and cosa is very opinionated about this (and may
also change from under us in the future).
(Another big difference for example is that cosa doesn't care about
non-unified mode, whereas we *need* to have coverage for this until we
fully kill it.)
Really, the most important bit we want from there is the
unprivileged-via-supermin bits. So we copy and adapt that here. One
obvious improvement then is sharing this code more easily (e.g. a
`cosa runasroot` or something?)
However, we still use the FCOS manifest (frozen at a specific tag). It's
a realistic example, and because of the lockfiles and pool, we get good
reproducibility.
2019-12-22 01:42:09 +03:00
# # check that de_DE was culled
# ostree --repo=${repo} cat ${treeref} /usr/etc/lang-test.de.date.txt > out.txt
# assert_file_has_content out.txt 'Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 UTC 1970'
# ostree --repo=${repo} cat ${treeref} /usr/etc/lang-test.de.touch.txt > out.txt
# assert_file_has_content out.txt 'missing file operand'
if ostree --repo= ${ repo } ls ${ treeref } /usr/bin/rpmostree-postprocess-lang-test.sh 2>err.txt; then
2017-08-30 23:24:54 +03:00
assert_not_reached "we failed to unlink?"
fi
assert_file_has_content err.txt "error: No such file or directory"
2016-12-09 01:31:20 +03:00
echo "ok install-langs"
