rpm-ostree/doc/rpmostree-sections.txt

<SECTION>
<FILE>librpmostree-dbquery</FILE>
rpm_ostree_db_query
</SECTION>

<SECTION>
<FILE>librpmostree-package</FILE>
RpmOstreePackage
rpm_ostree_package_get_type
rpm_ostree_package_get_name
rpm_ostree_package_get_evr
rpm_ostree_package_get_arch
rpm_ostree_package_get_nevra
</SECTION>
doc: Add gtk-doc for new library 2015-04-09 00:20:50 +03:00			`<SECTION>`
			`<FILE>librpmostree-dbquery</FILE>`
			`rpm_ostree_db_query`
			`</SECTION>`
lib: Add RpmOstreePackage The `QueryResult` class ended up being too awkward; having NEVRA strings meant for example that clients would have to parse them. It would be harder to present something like the current `rpm-ostree upgrade` package diff output. Now...I debated quite a while before doing this patch. The thing that's really awful about creating this library is there are SO MANY layers. rpm-ostree → libhif → hawkey → libsolv → librpm. It's enough to make one question whether one is actually accomplishing anything or just contributing to a collective insanity... Let's pretend for now it's the former. Closes: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/pull/136 2015-04-16 05:20:57 +03:00
			`<SECTION>`
			`<FILE>librpmostree-package</FILE>`
			`RpmOstreePackage`
			`rpm_ostree_package_get_type`
			`rpm_ostree_package_get_name`
			`rpm_ostree_package_get_evr`
			`rpm_ostree_package_get_arch`
			`rpm_ostree_package_get_nevra`
			`</SECTION>`