IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Make `upgrade` use the same trick as `deploy` to determine if a new
deployment was laid down. Apart from those two, all other operations
that can lay down a new deployment always do so in the happy path.
Prep for further work.
Closes: #983
Approved by: cgwalters
Before, when using rpm-ostree -h command, the command
description was shown together with the command itself
Now, we separate the command description out, providing
user a better view of the description.
Closes: #916
Approved by: jlebon
This is one more step towards making rpm-ostree more powerful in its
quest to be the ultimate *hybrid* image/package system. Package layering
allows us to add packages on top of the base package set received from
the content provider. However, we're not able to remove or replace
packages in the base set itself.
This patch introduces a new `override` command, which is for now nested
under the experimental `ex` command. The `override` command will allow
users to modify the base package set itself. The first implemented
subcommands are `remove` and `reset`.
A stub has been provided for the more useful `replace` subcommand,
though much of the needed logic for that operation are implemented in
this patch as part of the `remove` subcommand.
Part of: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/485Closes: #797
Approved by: cgwalters
Add support for --install/--uninstall to upgrade/deploy/rebase by
calling out to UpdateDeployment(). Since it's not released yet, back out
the support for install-local-packages in the options variant for
PkgChange(), and make it instead use UpdateDeployment() as needed.
Closes: #711
Approved by: cgwalters
One interesting note here was that I couldn't use glnx_throw in as many
places as I wanted because EXIT_SUCCESS/EXIT_FAILURE are the exact
opposite of that semantic. It was still convenient to use though as a
short-form for g_set_error().
Closes: #704
Approved by: cgwalters
This is the same change that was done for PkgChange(). It will be
required if we want to support specifying local packages through e.g.
--install switches.
Closes: #704
Approved by: cgwalters
