IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Instead of basing our decision to use the local `/etc` on whether we're
using `dracut --rebuild`, base it directly on a boolean parameter.
This is relevant in the client-side when initramfs regeneration is
requested as well as a kernel override. In such cases, we do want to use
the local `/etc`, but we'd skip that path because we didn't also use
`dracut --rebuild`.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806588
There's a lot going on here, but essentially:
1. We change the `vmcheck` model so that it always operates on an
immutable base image. It takes that image and dynamically launches a
separate VM for each test using `kola spawn`. This means we can drop
a lot of hacks around re-using the same VMs.
2. Following from 1., `vmoverlay` now takes as input a base image,
overlays the built rpm-ostree bits, then creates a new base image. Of
course, we don't have to do this in CI, because we build FCOS with
the freshly built RPMs (so it uses `SKIP_VMOVERLAY=1`). `vmoverlay`
then will be more for the developer case where one doesn't want to
iterate via `cosa build` to test rpm-ostree changes. I say "will"
because the functionality doesn't exist yet; I'd like to enhance
`cosa dev-overlay` to do this. (Note `vmsync` should still works just
as before too.)
3. `vmcheck` can be run without building the tree first, as
`tests/vmcheck.sh`. The `make vmcheck` target still exists though for
finger compatibility and better meshing with `vmoverlay` in the
developer case.
What's really nice about using kola spawn is that it takes care of a lot
of things for us, such as the qemu command, journal and console
gathering, and SSH.
Similarly to the compose testsuites, we're using parallel here to run
multiple vmcheck tests at once. (On developer laptops, we cap
parallelism at `$(nproc) - 1`).
This is one of the tests right now that assumes it's running on f29.
We might be sort of in this awkward dual path for a while where we want
tests to run on both f29 (i.e. FAH) and f30 (i.e. FCOS).
Closes: #1900
Approved by: cgwalters
This teaches the client to fetch packages from URLs directly so that one
doesn't have to `curl` first and then install. Supported anywhere
package filenames are allowed (notably: `install` and
`override replace`).
One neat things about this is that we download the file into an
`O_TMPFILE` and then pass on ownership of that fd directly to the
daemon. So at no point are the packages actually laying visible on the
system. (Assuming the filesystem supports `O_TMPFILE` that is).
This adds direct linking to libcurl and openssl, two libraries which we
were already pulling in indirectly.
Closes: #1508
Approved by: cgwalters
Previously we merged: #1228 AKA 12dc565b00
My recollection is that was working on it the background, while doing
something else, and I clearly didn't get to the point of testing it "for real".
There are many interlocking issues here to make this work. For example,
the "remove RPM" logic needs special handling for the kernel, because
we also inject content into `/usr/lib/ostree-boot` and also generate
the initramfs, etc.
The architecture I chose is to have the core *detect* when a kernel
is changed, and also call into the kernel processing code when removing
a kernel package. But the logic for doing kernel reinstallation client-side
is best alongside the initramfs generation logic which already existed
in the sysroot upgrader.
I extended the test suite to cover what was failing before, and I
tested this interactively. But I'm uncertain about adding a test
for actually *booting* into the GA kernel as it's quite possible
some bits in userspace rely on a newer kernel. Fixing this properly
really wants some infrastructure to better "re-version" an existing
package without changing its content.
Closes: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/1334Closes: #1346
Approved by: jlebon
The goal here is to support `override replace kernel.x86_64.rpm`.
There's a whole lot of logic in libdnf to support having multiple
kernel packages installed. AIUI, that was implemented because:
1) The kernel is the biggest source of regressions
2) It'd be quite noticeable if all of your kernel modules were deleted
Of course point 2) applies to a lot of userspace too...that's something
rpm-ostree fixes of course.
Anyways, in some testing all we need to do really is just turn that
logic off unconditionally.
Closes: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/946Closes: #1228
Approved by: jlebon
