IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
E.g. the generation timestamp, repos that were enabled, and their
generation timestamps.
This is just generally useful, though I'd like to make use specifically
of the new `metadata.generated` key in FCOS to drive versioning:
https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-releng-automation/pull/50
We have contacted all contributors to the code in `rust/` and
that code is now all relicensed under the "standard Rust license"
of `Apache 2.0 OR MIT`.
[Due to an accident](https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/1890),
some GPLv2+ code was imported in the C side, and we're unlikely to
easily change that now. Make this more official by adding the GPLv2.
I'd like to go through the C code and add SPDX and possibly investigate
relicensing some of the GPLv2+ code to LGPLv2+ but, not right now.
For a bit more about Rust and SPDX, see [this issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/2039).
Closes: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/1890Closes: #1897
Approved by: jlebon
There are two reasons for this:
1. I'd like to add overrides semantics to lockfiles, and keying by the
package name only makes this much easier.
2. I'd like to make the digest optional, and keeping it as a tuple makes
this awkward.
A map seems natural too since it makes it more clear that we don't
expect multiple specifications for the same package name.
Another tiny advantage is that it's easier to process with e.g. `jq`.
Closes: #1867
Approved by: cgwalters
I wanted to modify the lockfile specification, but then remembered that
it currently lives in two places right now: once on the Rust side where
it's deserialized, and once more on the C side where it's serialized.
If we could write the lockfile from the Rust side, then we wouldn't have
to deal with the `GVariantBuild` and `json-glib` goop, and instead
we could consistently use serde against the same struct for both
serialization and deserialization.
But there isn't an easy way to do this given that the state to be
serialized is intrinsically linked to libdnf.
So this patch takes the next step in our oxidation process by adding a
minimal `libdnf_sys` module which allows us to call `libdnf` functions
from Rust. This is not the prettiest code I've written, and there's
definitely some polishing that could be done. But I think overall it's a
move in the right general direction: as we oxidize more things, we'll at
some point *have* to integrate more tightly with the C side in a
bidirectional way, instead of the "one-way" approach we've been using so
far.
For this patch specifically, in exchange we get a unique source of truth
for the lockfile spec, just like the treefile, and we drop a lot of C
code in the process.
Closes: #1867
Approved by: cgwalters
