IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Fix regression from https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/pull/870
which caused `vmsync` and `vmoverlay` to no longer actually overlay
ostree bits.
We go back to using `--files-from`, but just make sure to filter out the
stuff that we don't need (and which previously caused issues).
Closes: #907
Approved by: cgwalters
Now that we require clients to have an active session to RegisterClient,
we can't use runuser to check for non-root functionality. Add a new
vm_cmd_as() function to allow connecting as a different user. While
we're there, do some minor cleanups to consistently use `local` when
possible.
Closes: #894
Approved by: cgwalters
To catch things like https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/826
during testing.
(Really IMO this should be the system-wide default except GNOME and
lots of apps would start dumping core all over the place... 😢)
Closes: #828
Approved by: jlebon
Copy the bits from `overlay.sh` that takes the ostree files from the
build container so that we also get updated ostree bits when we
`vmsync`.
Also make sure to `daemon-reload` before restarting the daemon.
Closes: #803
Approved by: cgwalters
I need to build ostree from git too. So now my workflow is:
```
export insttree=/srv/walters/tmp/rootfs
cd ostree
make && make install DESTDIR=${insttree}
cd rpm-ostree
make && make install DESTDIR=${insttree}
env VMCHECK_INSTTREE=${insttree} make vmoverlay
```
Closes: #705
Approved by: jlebon
The actual problem I am trying to fix with this is fallout from the
introduction of `/usr/libexec/rpm-ostreed`, which required a SELinux
policy change. Specifically for CentOS, the base policy is rev'd
slowly.
My hope was that by merging the daemon code back into `/usr/bin/rpm-ostree`
which is labeled `install_exec_t`, starting via systemd would do
the right thing. It turns out that doesn't happen.
Now later, I'm picking this patch back up because I want to do multprocessing in
the daemon (and in the core), and it makes sense to share code between them,
because multiprocessing will need to go through a re-exec path.
Another benefit is we avoid duplicated text (libglnx, internal helpers) between
the two binaries.
Closes: #292
Approved by: jlebon
I think since I landed a change to `--enable-new-name`, `/usr/bin/rpm-ostree`
became a symlink, and without the `-l` switch, rsync skips over them.
Hence, we have only been testing in vmcheck the old binaries, not new ones.
Oops.
Closes: #585
Approved by: jlebon
In the container build + vagrant test workflow, we have to run `make
vmsync` from the env in which autoconf was run, which is the container.
However, when using git worktrees (which is useful in this scenario to
avoid having to overwrite your local builds) and a CentOS build
container, the git inside is too old to understand worktrees, so let's
avoid invoking git in any of the test harness scripts.
Also make sure to restorecon after installing the new rpm-ostreed.
Closes: #555
Approved by: cgwalters
This is just the final bit required to make sure the vagrant and
non-vagrant paths can work happily together. It's mostly minor fixes,
though the most major change which also affects vagrant is that we now
sync to the root home dir, rather than ~vagrant.
Closes: #524
Approved by: cgwalters
My development environment is now using "pet" docker containers.
I use VMs for testing things that require that (like rpm-ostree).
This patch builds on work from @jlebon in
https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/pull/509
to rework `vmcheck` such that it can work on any `ssh-config`. By
default we expect this to be Vagrant.
However, I go a lot farther and delete the `vmbuild` code that was
trying to do builds in a container on the target VM. I think this is
still worth pursuing at some point, but for now I think it's
reasonable to assume that the rpm-ostree developer audience uses Linux
as their host workstation and hence has containers.
(There's another important point here in that for developing lower
level things like rpm-ostree, there's a strong push to make the VM
disposable and not a pet)
Closes: #516
Approved by: jlebon
