IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
In the app, rebuild the exact command-line that the client used and pass
that to the daemon to be used as the transaction title. Especially in
transactions like `UpdateDeployment()`, we can avoid reverse-engineering
what the original command used was.
This will be used by the upcoming history feature to record the
command-line used in the journal.
Closes: #1824
Approved by: rfairley
Our trick of using layered commits as base commit updates doesn't jive
well with the new opportunistic reuse of the base rpmdb. The issue is
that a layered commit includes the rpmdb of *its* base commit at the
`/usr/lib/sysimage` location. So to convert it into a proper base commit
means that the layered rpmdb should move there.
Closes: #1502
Approved by: cgwalters
Since `/tmp` might be on tmpfs, so we'd lose it on reboot. But we have
tests that need it to persist across reboots.
Closes: #1531
Approved by: miabbott
We should be checking that there are no requested base replacements
here, not removals. This was likely a copy-paste slip-up from copying
the override-remove tests. I still kept those checks for sanity, and
just tacked on the correct ones.
Closes: #1323
Approved by: cgwalters
This fixes a small regression from #852 which prevented inactive
overrides to be reset. Which is funny, because that's exactly the most
likely time when you would want to reset an override.
Basically, the `!is_layered --> no overrides` doesn't make sense for
inactive overrides. I suspect most people worked around this by just
using `reset --all`.
Closes: #1323
Approved by: cgwalters
This is an essential functionality rather than a nicety. Some
replacements can *only* be done without conflicts if we can remove
packages at the same time.
I do like that this has to be done explicitly, though OTOH, I can
definitely see folks wanting an `--allow-removals` type of switch in the
future.
Closes: #1255Closes: #1257
Approved by: cgwalters
We have a *lot* of experimental functionality. I think the
`override` bits are fleshed out enough now that we can lift
the `ex` designation. For example, jlebon fixed SELinux
labeling in the presence of override-replace.
Closes: #1089
Approved by: jlebon
I suspect a common pattern with local replacement overrides is to
simultaneously replace a group of packages that depend on each other in
one shot, as is the case with docker, docker-common, and
docker-rhel-push-plugin currently in Fedora Atomic Host. In such cases,
we can print a cleaner diff in the status to make it easier to grok.
Before:
ReplacedBasePackages: strace 4.18-1.fc26 -> 4.19-1.fc26, docker-common 2:1.13.1-22.gitb5e3294.fc26 -> 2:1.13.1-21.git27e468e.fc26, docker 2:1.13.1-22.gitb5e3294.fc26 -> 2:1.13.1-21.git27e468e.fc26, docker-rhel-push-plugin 2:1.13.1-22.gitb5e3294.fc26 -> 2:1.13.1-21.git27e468e.fc26
After:
ReplacedBasePackages: docker-common docker docker-rhel-push-plugin 2:1.13.1-22.gitb5e3294.fc26 -> 2:1.13.1-21.git27e468e.fc26, strace 4.18-1.fc26 -> 4.19-1.fc26
Closes: #1004
Approved by: cgwalters
Add experimental support for replacing packages from the base layer with
local RPMs. This is useful for example, to cherry pick a fixed package,
or to roll back to a previous package version. Like with pkg removals,
only files in /usr are actually replaced.
This patch also contains a few usability improvements as well, e.g.
showing the full NEVRA of removed packages rather than just their names,
and support for resetting overrides using either the pkgname or NEVRA.
Closes: #852
Approved by: cgwalters
