IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Both `upgrade` and `deploy` already support this. There's no reason why
all the remaining "deployment-creating" commands shouldn't. Prompted by
https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/issues/1897 which
will need this specifically for `rebase`.
We need to adapt some of our tests here which assume that `/sysroot` is
writable. However, in FCOS this is no longer the case now that we enable
`sysroot.readonly`.
We only remount rw for the couple of operations that need it so that we
still retain coverage for the ro path everywhere else.
This has a bit of history, but essentially in 1c01141e, we made both
`upgrade` and `deploy` automatically exit 77 if there were no changes.
Then in c3f1e7c8, we only changed `upgrade` so that it became gated
behind `--upgrade-unchanged-exit-77`.
I think we should carry this forward into `deploy` as well. The way I
look at this is: the default UX shouldn't require users to care about
special exit codes. That's something scripts care about. In its vanilla
form, either a command should error out or succeed.
This patch tries to add some consistency by introducing a new
`--unchanged-exit-77` in both `deploy` and `upgrade` (where it just
replaces the previous switch). The naming here matches what `install`
has too.
So... this does break backwards compatibility for any scripts which
relied on that behaviour. Though the only app I know today which wants
deploy semantics and doesn't use the D-Bus API is Zincati, which
actually hit this issue. There's also RHCOS, though the `pivot` there
uses `rebase`, not `deploy`. So overall, I think this is worth breaking
now while we're still in a transitionary period in the downstreams?
Closes: #1906
Approved by: cgwalters
Drop the use of Ansible everywhere. In the few cases where we really
Python, just spawn a container instead.
This is required to be able to hack on Fedora CoreOS.
Closes: #1850
Approved by: jlebon
Of course, update agents driving rpm-ostree know exactly to which commit
they want the system to upgrade, so `upgrade --lock-finalization` is not
helpful. Teach `deploy` the `--lock-finalization` switch too.
Closes: #1846
Approved by: lucab
Teach `UpdateDeployment` to make use of libostree's staging lock and
then add a `FinalizeDeployment` API to perform the final unlock &
reboot.
I also added a hidden CLI to make testing this easier, but also because
it's likely the FCOS-agent-yet-to-be-named will just end up using the
CLI to keep it simple.
Closes: #1748Closes: #1814
Approved by: lucab
RPM-OSTree has been pretty good so far at consuming the exact same RPMs
used for traditional OSes without modifications. This is important,
because shielding RPMs from the OSTree abstraction means we remain
compatible with a large portion of the ecosystem.
However, there are some apps that definitely require rethinking their
approach. The example right now is akmods, which has a patch proposed to
build kmods at `%post` time on OSTree systems instead of from the
daemon.[1]
In such situations, scriptlets need something to key off of for the
OSTree-specific approach. The `/run/ostree-booted` file is the de facto
API to determine if we're running on an OSTree system or not. This patch
simply extends this API so that scriptlets can naturally make use of
them.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1667014Closes: #1750
Approved by: cgwalters
Teach rpm-ostree to interpret rebases where the remote component is a
path to a local repo, e.g.:
rpm-ostree rebase /mnt/ostree/repo:my/target/ref
Essentially, the local remote in this case is considered "ephemeral".
It's kind of the equivalent of, on traditional systems:
dnf install --repofrompath repo,/path/to/repodata ...
The use case for this is in OpenShift v4, in which upgrades are done
from containers containing the OSTree commit. There, we want to point
RPM-OSTree directly at the repo in the mounted container and rebase to
the checksum.
For now, the option is marked experimental. One major reason for this is
that the way we pass the repo differs on RHEL7 vs other platforms. (See
comment block in `rpmostree-dbus-helpers.c` for details).
Related: https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/issues/314
Co-authored-by: Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>
Closes: #1732
Approved by: cgwalters
Minor regression from #1587. There were places that were still doing
`dnf_context_set_cache_age()` manually, but those calls didn't exactly
have the intended effect since the core now handled caching itself.
The actual result was that the metadata was still being updated, but not
during the `dnf_repo_check` pass that the core does, but rather the
`Importing rpm-md` pass it does right after. So then, we were
incorrectly printing `(cached)` even though we'd update it afterwards.
Switch to the new way of doing things.
Closes: #1686
Approved by: cgwalters
Try to tease out a bit more info from the journal by looking at the
systemd message when the service transitions to the dead state or even
looking at the OSTree output itself.
Example outputs:
```
[root@f28-ros ~]# rpm-ostree status
State: idle
Warning: failed to finalize previous deployment
error: opendir(ostree/deploy/fedora-atomic/deploy/887c95887a3047a60372016a0d84536530755b60df3cca33c819f7606e220adf.0): No such file or directory
check `journalctl -b -1 -u ostree-finalize-staged.service`
AutomaticUpdates: disabled
...
```
```
[root@f28-ros ~]# rpm-ostree status
State: idle
Warning: failed to finalize previous deployment
ostree-finalize-staged.service: Failed with result 'timeout'.
check `journalctl -b -1 -u ostree-finalize-staged.service`
AutomaticUpdates: disabled
...
```
Closes: #1601
Approved by: cgwalters
Sample output:
```
$ rpm-ostree status
State: idle
Warning: failed to finalize previous deployment
check `journalctl -b -1 -u ostree-finalize-staged.service`
AutomaticUpdates: disabled
...
```
(Though open to tweaking it).
I also played with directly invoking `journalctl` for the user, but that
can get really spammy with e.g. `os-prober` output and such.
I wrote this in Rust using journal API wrappers because I also plan to
implement the `history` command in Rust and will also enhance that new
`journal` module there for that.
Requires: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/1750
Requires: https://github.com/jmesmon/rust-systemd/pull/54
(Though I've pointed the manifest at my branch for now for CI).
Closes: #1567Closes: #1601
Approved by: cgwalters
Since `/tmp` might be on tmpfs, so we'd lose it on reboot. But we have
tests that need it to persist across reboots.
Closes: #1531
Approved by: miabbott
We're looking to embed an ostree commit inside a container image,
to make it easier to transport around with other images.
Conceptually here the host system is tracking a container (just
like for rojig we're tracking an RPM). This is the first step
towards making that support nicer; tooling can do
`rebase --custom-origin-url oscontainer://quay.io/exampleos@sha256:...`
and have that show up in `rpm-ostree status`.
There are two values, one intended to be machine readable (like
the `ostree://` and `rojig://` and one for humans which we
display when an admin types `rpm-ostree upgrade`.
This builds on prior work in
27bd7b97bb from #1396 .
Closes: #1406
Approved by: jlebon
First the pinning tests would try to pin a staged deployment,
and some of the later tests here depend on a subtle way on the
state of the system. It's tempting to do a `reset` before each one
and reboot but this makes things work.
There's some additional assertions here as I went through and
was debugging.
Prep for making staging the default.
Closes: #1438
Approved by: jlebon
With the new support for pinning deployments, we need to also update
rpm-ostree to clean up the transient state as is now done in the ostree
sysroot upgrader.
This addresses that issue as well as tries to be a little cleaner in how
we clean up other transient state. Notably, we add a new helper function
to `RpmOstreeOrigin` to do this for us and use it in the upgrader. In
other cases, we do want this transient information since it allows us to
describe the deployment.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/1595Closes: #1372
Approved by: cgwalters
Our test suite originated when package layering was still being
developed, but now that that's mature, the logic where layering
tests are distinct makes less sense.
The `basic` test had grown to really be a collection of many
miscellaneous things. Let's make that more explicit. Further,
let's avoid having each test suite grow too large; when a single
test fails we don't have an easy way to rerun just that test,
so a crude way to have faster local iteration is to split into groups.
My plan is to reintroduce a `basic` test that covers the basics
of all functionality - update, deploy, layering, etc. The advanced/corner
cases of layering like the `rm -rf /` test would still live in a
`test-layering.sh` or so.
Closes: #1336
Approved by: jlebon
