IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Add a `selinux` verb to treespec, and bind it from treefile. If
set, use it in the core to load an initial policy before import,
if we didn't already set a policy.
In practice right now this is only used from the compose path
since the SysrootUpgrader uses the policy from the merge deployment.
Unset the policy if rojig mode is enabled.
Now, non-SELinux use cases are required to set `selinux: false`
in the treespec. For `ex container` I just set it in our example
specs. Probably that should forcibly disable it in the
treespec but eh, it's experimental.
The other case I can think of is client-side layering; before
we would create a policy using the target root, but it
wasn't a *hard* requirement, i.e. we didn't error out if
`policy_get_name() == NULL`. Let's preserve that semantic by
hooking off of whether `_new_system()` was used.
Prep for sharing code with `compose rojig`.
Closes: #1630
Approved by: jlebon
In #875 AKA b46fc35901 we
added support for the `releasever` option in treefiles. I am
pretty sure it worked at the time...but I didn't add tests.
Either it never worked or some refactoring broke it. The whole chain of
`GKeyFile` → `GVariant` is so confusing. Anyways fix it by copying the string.
Now let's use it by default in the compose tests, and while we're here bump
those to F27.
I'm doing this patch now as I was playing with doing a compose from
the `/usr/share/rpm-ostree/treefile.json` and wanted to use the stock
`.repo` files.
Closes: #1220
Approved by: jlebon
In an unprivileged case, we can't do this on the real filesystem. For
`ex container`, we want to completely ignore uid/gid. I added a test
installing `httpd` which failed previously.
TODO: For non-root `--ex-unified-core` we need to do it as a commit modifier.
Closes: #940
Approved by: jlebon
More work for unified core; this was one of the biggest parts of the `ostree
diff` when comparing a unified core treecompose of Fedora Atomic Host versus
the libdnf path.
This is also the first case where we're teaching the pkgcache to redownload
based on state.
Closes: #1105
Approved by: jlebon
Switching to the `_CONSUME` flag revealed an "oh god how did I write that"
bug in the previous patch in https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/pull/1046
AKA commit: 334f0b89be
The way that actually fixed the bug before was because we were using
hardlink checkouts, and we were operating outside an `rofiles-fuse`
context, we simply directly changed the on-disk object mode.
But with the `_CONSUME` flag we started deleting the files as we write,
meaning that stopped working.
I *initially* wrote a patch to do the same split "prepare/processing/commit"
flow that treecompose and package layering do, but that can't really fix this
bug - we need to do it on import.
So do the chmod on import and drop the postprocessing bits.
Closes: #1067
Approved by: jlebon
For the `ex container` case, there's no security issues here; one shouldn't be
doing user management in these roots at all.
This is for work on exporting `ex container` roots to OCI as non-root. Without
this fix, libostree just tries to `openat()` the object for export to tar, and
fails.
See also https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/1045Closes: #1046
Approved by: jlebon
We have some unit-style tests that run `ex container`, but
they aren't "real"; they don't use scripts for example. Let's
add tests for this similar to `tests/compose`.
We use a 26 base, but the target repos need to be 27
to pick up the fix for: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478172
Add some bits to share infra between `tests/compose` and `tests/ex-container`;
basically handling the rpmmd repos. I tweaked things to be more streamlined
there between the `.papr.yml` and the test script.
Right now this is just one test for `bash`, but lays some of the infrastructure
for doing more. One thing that we need to do to improve more here is to better
cache RPMs, a bit like the compose tests do.
Closes: #1024
Approved by: jlebon
