IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This patch introduces a new `AutomaticUpdatePolicy` configuration. This
was a long time coming for rpm-ostree, given that its update model makes
it extremely apt for such a feature.
The config supports a `check` mode, which should be very useful to
Atomic Workstation users, as well as a `reboot` mode, which could be
used in its present form in simple single node Atomic Host situations.
There is still a lot of work to be done, including integrating
advisories, and supporting a `deploy` mode. This feature hopefully will
be leveraged as well by higher-level projects like GNOME Software and
Cockpit.
Closes: #1147
Approved by: cgwalters
Making this a separate commit, since it's a first for rpm-ostree. We now
have a conf file complete with man page! No options yet though.
Interestingly, there was a function called `rpmostreed_reload_config`
which was declared but never defined. Didn't look too much into that.
We make sure that the config is part of the things we reload when users
call `rpm-ostree reload`.
Closes: #1204
Approved by: cgwalters
I just rebased my pet container to F27, and this was the only hiccup
when trying to build rpm-ostree. Basically, gdbus-codegen is sensitive
to how it's called when trying to find its own Python modules. Calling
it with the explicit `/usr` prefix works around that. This was fixed
upstream in [1], but hasn't made its way down the metaphorical stream
yet. See [2] for more information.
[1] b9f2ea4235
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485853Closes: #1153
Approved by: cgwalters
This allows non-root users access to the rpm-ostree daemon, which is
a pre-requirement for gnome-software rpm-ostree support.
Closes: #745Closes: #825
Approved by: cgwalters
There are a few different use cases here. First, for layering new packages,
there's no good reason for us to force a reboot. Second, we want some support
for cherry-picking security updates and allowing admins to restart services. Finally,
at some point we should offer support for entirely replacing the running tree
if that's what the user wants.
Until now we've been very conservative, but there's a spectrum here. In
particular, this patch changes things so we push a rollback before we start
doing anything live. I think in practice, many use cases would be totally fine
with doing most changes live, and falling back to the rollback if something went
wrong.
This initial code drop *only* supports live layering of new packages. However,
a lot of the base infrastructure is laid for future work.
For now, this will be classified as an experimental feature, hence `ex livefs`.
Part of: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/639Closes: #652
Approved by: jlebon
Right now, the `rpm-ostree cleanup` logic calls into a "public static" method of
`RpmOstreeSysrootUpgrader`. That's because today, a lot of the high level "core
server side" logic lived in that class. However, it's only for upgrades (well,
really "generating pending deployments").
As I'm working on "livefs" which is really something different, I find it needs
to interact with some of `SysrootUpgrader`'s logic. Let's introduce a "sysroot
core" which is just a set of static functions taking an `OstreeSysroot*`, and
then all 3 of cleanup, (upgrade|deploy) and livefs can use these.
Closes: #708
Approved by: jlebon
Just like `rpm-ostree ex`, for things like `ex livefs` that have DBus
interfaces, we should segregate these off so that people know they're unstable.
And conversely that they can test for the presence of the method on the main
interface for stability.
I initially tried having the same `RpmostreeOS` object implement both
but couldn't work out how to do that; see https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-app-devel-list/2017-March/msg00161.htmlCloses: #701
Approved by: jlebon
The actual problem I am trying to fix with this is fallout from the
introduction of `/usr/libexec/rpm-ostreed`, which required a SELinux
policy change. Specifically for CentOS, the base policy is rev'd
slowly.
My hope was that by merging the daemon code back into `/usr/bin/rpm-ostree`
which is labeled `install_exec_t`, starting via systemd would do
the right thing. It turns out that doesn't happen.
Now later, I'm picking this patch back up because I want to do multprocessing in
the daemon (and in the core), and it makes sense to share code between them,
because multiprocessing will need to go through a re-exec path.
Another benefit is we avoid duplicated text (libglnx, internal helpers) between
the two binaries.
Closes: #292
Approved by: jlebon
The next step will be to design a DBus + commandline API for this. In the
meantime, there are some small subtle new features like honoring the dry-run
option for upgrade. I'm not testing that explicitly yet, but I think that's OK.
Closes: #593
Approved by: jlebon
See https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/405
This patch adds an (off by default) `--enable-new-name` build option
which currently defaults to `nts`. This is purely additive, and
the intention is that we'll support the rpm-ostree name in
perpetuity most likely.
At the moment, we add a new name for:
- /usr/bin/$name
- The systemd unit file
But we notably *don't* attempt to add a new name to the DBus API,
as it'd be a lot more invasive of a patch, and less payoff (it's
mostly just programs/scripts that interact with the DBus).
Closes: #497
Approved by: jlebon
So I was trying to hack on my host's copy of rpm-ostree inside a pet
docker container, but ran into a conflict with libhif since dnf uses
it. I think we basically need to *always* build the bundled path,
rather than what I'm doing with CAHC and FADC where it's built as a
regular RPM.
It's not really sustainable right now for us to have both bundled and
not-bundled build paths - and we need to support co-installation with
dnf.
Another major issue is that we want to version lock with libhif -
right now our CI and both CAHC/FADC track libhif master, but that
means everything breaks if libhif breaks and we don't immediately
port.
git submodules solve all of these problems - the same as we're doing
with libglnx.
libglnx is *designed* for use as a git submodule, where as libhif
needs to support being both bundled and not-bundled. So we end up
with some hacks on our side, but I think it's all not too bad. I've
marked build rules with `# bundled libhif` so we know where to find
them later when libhif is stable.
Closes: #357
Approved by: jlebon
We need the ability to both add and remove packages as one
transaction in the general case (`Conflicts:`), plus it'd
be quite nice to allow users to do multiple package things
before rebooting.
And finally, this deletes a lot of duplicate code.
Where I'm really thinking this should go is we only have one
transaction type internally for at least upgrade/pkg as a group.
Closes: #326
Approved by: jlebon
This builds upon the earlier prototype in
https://github.com/cgwalters/atomic-pkglayer
The `.origin` file says for a replicated installation:
[origin]
refspec=local:rhel-atomic-host/7/x86_64/standard
If you then run `rpm-ostree pkg-add strace`, it will result in a new tree with:
[origin]
baserefspec=local:rhel-atomic-host/7/x86_64/standard
[packages]
requested=strace;
Work still remaining here is to teach `rpm-ostree status` and
`rpm-ostree upgrade` about this.
Closes: #289
Approved by: cgwalters
The current policy is to only allow the root user access to the Sysroot
and OS interfaces, but this can be expressed in the static bus config.
The long-term intention is to integrate with PolicyKit. Leave comments
in the code stating so but remove the unnecessary authorization handler
for the time being, just so there's less code to review.
Implementing a template pattern for transactions.
The TransactionClass is now abstract, and transaction_new() is replaced
with various method-specific functions like transaction_new_upgrade().
These custom subclasses live in a new file transaction-types.[ch].
Further, transaction_monitor_new_transaction() is replaced with
transaction_monitor_add(). So the handlers for "OS" interface methods
need only create an appropriate transaction instance and hand it off to
the transaction monitor.
libostree logs messages to systemd's journal and also to stdout.
Redirect our own stdout back to ourselves so we can capture those
messages and pass them on to clients. Admittedly hokey but avoids
hacking libostree directly (for now).
A few changes:
- Modify the D-Bus API to include a Finish() method instead of a Start()
method, the idea being the client calls Finish() to obtain the final
status and optional message once the transaction indicates it's done.
Calling Finish() also removes the transaction object from the bus.
- Introduce Transaction class as a thin wrapper for RPMOSTreeTransaction.
Stores the status info for Finish(), detects when the caller's bus name
vanishes, and emits various status signals to TransactionMonitor.
- Introduce TransactionMonitor as a factory class for Transactions that
also handles book keeping chores like tracking the active Transaction.
The Sysroot and OS interfaces share a TransactionMonitor instance.
Creates, configures and exports an RPMOSTreeTransaction object from a
GDBusMethodInvocation. The interface is exported relative to the object
path on which the D-Bus method was called.
