IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Continuing the momentum to use kola ext tests.
One obvious benefit of this as the porting continues
is that we can share our built test RPMs across
different tests, e.g. we can have a `testdaemon` package
instead of a `test-livefs-service` package.
I'd like to get to the point where we drop the `vmcheck.sh`/`libvm.sh` stuff.
Instead we use kola directly, and write our tests in a way that they
default to run on the target, not on the host because it's *much*
more natural to type e.g. `rpm-ostree upgrade` instead of `vm_rpmostree upgrade`.
We'd done a bit of porting, but a blocker was that a lot of our
tests dynamically generate RPMs and send them over. Instead,
let's generate the RPMs ahead of time in a "build" step, then
they all get passed at once via kola ext data. Add the concept
of multiple repo versions too.
Right now we only generate the one RPM needed for the `layering-local`
test and port it.
The main goal here is to get `assert_jq()` usable in
kola tests.
This was forked from ostree long ago but we aren't
using most of it. I want to try to move this into kola where
we're just using `tests/common` but this code references
`tests/gpghome` which we weren't using.
Only a few things here reference `SRCDIR` - change those
to fail for now if it's not set, since we're not running
those tests in kola yet. I will eventually try to
clean that up later.
Again, a lot going on here, but essentially, we adapt the compose tests
to run either privileged or fully unprivileged via supermin, just like
cosa.
I actually got more than halfway through this initially using `cosa
build` directly for testing. But in the end, we simply need more
flexibility than that. We want to be able to manipulate exactly how
rpm-ostree is called, and cosa is very opinionated about this (and may
also change from under us in the future).
(Another big difference for example is that cosa doesn't care about
non-unified mode, whereas we *need* to have coverage for this until we
fully kill it.)
Really, the most important bit we want from there is the
unprivileged-via-supermin bits. So we copy and adapt that here. One
obvious improvement then is sharing this code more easily (e.g. a
`cosa runasroot` or something?)
However, we still use the FCOS manifest (frozen at a specific tag). It's
a realistic example, and because of the lockfiles and pool, we get good
reproducibility.
There's a lot going on here, but essentially:
1. We change the `vmcheck` model so that it always operates on an
immutable base image. It takes that image and dynamically launches a
separate VM for each test using `kola spawn`. This means we can drop
a lot of hacks around re-using the same VMs.
2. Following from 1., `vmoverlay` now takes as input a base image,
overlays the built rpm-ostree bits, then creates a new base image. Of
course, we don't have to do this in CI, because we build FCOS with
the freshly built RPMs (so it uses `SKIP_VMOVERLAY=1`). `vmoverlay`
then will be more for the developer case where one doesn't want to
iterate via `cosa build` to test rpm-ostree changes. I say "will"
because the functionality doesn't exist yet; I'd like to enhance
`cosa dev-overlay` to do this. (Note `vmsync` should still works just
as before too.)
3. `vmcheck` can be run without building the tree first, as
`tests/vmcheck.sh`. The `make vmcheck` target still exists though for
finger compatibility and better meshing with `vmoverlay` in the
developer case.
What's really nice about using kola spawn is that it takes care of a lot
of things for us, such as the qemu command, journal and console
gathering, and SSH.
Similarly to the compose testsuites, we're using parallel here to run
multiple vmcheck tests at once. (On developer laptops, we cap
parallelism at `$(nproc) - 1`).
This bumps the requirement on the controlling host to Python 3 only.
It also bumps the requirement on the target host to Python 3 as well
since FCOS doesn't ship Python 2 right now.
Though we'll need to eventually drop all Python usage anyway, but at
least let's get tests passing on FCOS first. (See related previous
patch).
Closes: #1828
Approved by: cgwalters
This is prep for running inside (unprivileged) Kube containers
as they exist today: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/1329
Sadly FUSE today uses a suid binary that ends up wanting CAP_SYS_ADMIN.
I think there's some work on FUSE-in-containers but I'm not sure of
the current status.
What rofiles-fuse here is doing here is protecting is the hardlinked
repo imports. But if `--cachedir` isn't specified, that repository
gets thrown away anyways. So there's no real value to using FUSE
here.
Also since nothing is cached, disable the devino cache.
We also make use of --force-copy-zerosized that just landed
in libostree: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/1752
Down the line ideally we gain the capability to detect if either
unprivileged overlayfs/FUSE are available. Then if `--cachedir`
is specified we can make things work.
Closes: #1591
Approved by: jlebon
Pick up security advisories when checking for pending updates and
include them in the `cached-update` property. On the client-side,
display them in the output of `status`.
This was part of the original vision for how useful a smart `check` mode
could be. It directly impacts how one manages their individual system
(e.g. when to reboot), and paves the way for integration into
higher-level apps that act at the cluster level.
Closes: #1249
Approved by: cgwalters
Our complicated heuristics for handling multiple packages of the same
name comes back to bite us. In the multilib case, we can have packages
of the same NEVR, but different arch, sitting in the same tree.
Previously, even if the arch was different, we would still mark it as an
upgrade or downgrade. But that complicates things in the case of
multiple packages of the same name in the same tree.
We greatly simplify things here by making the diff algorithm dumber. We
now only consider a package as "modified" (i.e. upgraded/downgraded) if
it has the same NA (but different EVR). This makes handling multilib
cases natural and seems worth it overall vs trying to handle the odd
e.g. noarch <--> archful pkg transitions that could happen.
Closes: #1230
Approved by: cgwalters
This patch introduces a new `AutomaticUpdatePolicy` configuration. This
was a long time coming for rpm-ostree, given that its update model makes
it extremely apt for such a feature.
The config supports a `check` mode, which should be very useful to
Atomic Workstation users, as well as a `reboot` mode, which could be
used in its present form in simple single node Atomic Host situations.
There is still a lot of work to be done, including integrating
advisories, and supporting a `deploy` mode. This feature hopefully will
be leveraged as well by higher-level projects like GNOME Software and
Cockpit.
Closes: #1147
Approved by: cgwalters
It obviously shouldn't block the ability to install, and anyways
the single use in `ksh` is not compelling. If someone comes up with
one we can revisit supporting this.
Closes: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/1216Closes: #1218
Approved by: jlebon
Basically we're choosing the libdnf behavior of omitting `Epoch: 0` which IMO is
the sane thing to do even though in *theory* they're different RPMs but
who would ever ship both without incrementing release/etc?
More information in: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/pull/187Closes: #1198
Approved by: cgwalters
This is the first step towards unifying how we introspect packages from
a specific commit. We currently do this in three ways: libdnf, librpm,
and now `rpmostree.rpmdb.pkglist`. I'd like to get to a point where we
only have `rpmostree.rpmdb.pkglist` and libdnf, the latter only when
more complex queries are required.
This patch teaches the `db diff` command to make use of the new db diff
API so that it can work even on metadata-only commits. This is relevant
for use cases mentioned in #558.
I didn't get rid of the `rpmhdrs_diff` functions right now because of
the `--changelogs` option: libdnf currently does not expose this, so we
fall back to the previous API in that case. OTOH, I wonder how much it's
actually used in the wild; maybe we could just nix it?
Closes: #1162
Approved by: cgwalters
`test -n` would always be true. Also while I have the patient open
let's make writing the file atomic. Maybe someday I'll be motivated
enough to write an `O_TMPFILE` patch for bash.
Closes: #1103
Approved by: jlebon
There's a lot of paths in the core related to SELinux policy changes and
relabeling packages. We currently have no test coverage for them. We add
support in the test libraries here to build such packages.
We also add a test that checks both that we correctly relabel RPMs when
the policy changes and that we handle layered packages that install
SELinux packages properly.
Closes: #999
Approved by: cgwalters
This is the rpm-ostree equivalent of
<47b4dd1b38>
Unfortunately, introspection uses `dlopen(), which doesn't quite
work when the DSO is compiled with ASAN but the outer executable
isn't.
Prep for syncing PAPR config with ostree.
Closes: #1000
Approved by: jlebon
File triggers are a post-RHEL7 thing; more information at
http://rpm.org/user_doc/file_triggers.html
There are two notable users I've been testing this with;
`glib2` and `vagrant`. The `vagrant` one is more immediately urgent,
since it makes `vagrant-libvirt` work, which I currently rely on
for my workstation dev.
I've tested things successfully with `vagrant`, and I did verify that we run the
`glib2` ones when doing `rpm-ostree ex container`.
Long term, more transaction file triggers are likely to live in
"base" packages like `glib2`. We don't implement those yet, but
extending this to do that shouldn't be too hard.
There was *significant* what I'd call reverse engineering of the
implementation in librpm. The file triggers code there is spread out
and abstracted in a few different places in the code. I found
trying to understand what header values were involved to be quite
tricky.
There are some corner cases like multiple patterns that I *think*
this does correctly, but could use more validation. The main
question I had was - is it required that the patterns for e.g.
`%transfiletriggerin` and `%transfiletriggerun` be identical?
Closes: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/648Closes: #869
Approved by: jlebon
This is required for glibc-all-langpacks at least:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367585
Otherwise, its usage is...extraordinarily rare. In fact looking at a snapshot of
`rpm-specs-20170518.tar.xz` from Fedora, the only other use is in
`postfix.spec`, and it appears bogus (the value is already expanded at build
time).
But the glibc case is special, as the value of `install_langs` is indeed
potentially dynamic per system.
Closes: #873
Approved by: jlebon
Seen in the wild with `vagrant`'s use of `%post -p /usr/bin/ruby`. This was a
very easy fix, and actually makes the code a little bit nicer, as we no longer
need to explicitly make the script executable, since we now pass it as
`argv[1]`, the same way librpm does. That in turn would make it possible to fix
the TODO and use `bwrap --file`, but that can come later.
Closes: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/856Closes: #858
Approved by: jlebon
Having to prepare RPMs in advance separately from the tests that use
them severely limits our ability to test various cases and to iterate
quickly when creating tests.
Add a new `build_rpm` function which can basically build the RPM on the
fly and update the yum repo afterwards. It makes it trivial to test
things like package updates:
build_rpm foo 1.0 1
<stuff>
build_rpm foo 1.0 2
<stuff>
The RPMs are all created inside the temporary test directory and thus
cleaned up on exit.
I'm doing this in a separate commit because it's the most important diff
of the transition and might be easy to lose in the larger diff where we
move all the tests to make use of this.
Closes: #854
Approved by: cgwalters
First, we need to preserve whitespace in the regexps. Second,
in the error path, all of our variables were wrong.
Commit 376a2cc3f5 is an excellent
poster child for how many bugs one can introduce in a single commit
for a ~5 line function.
Closes: #777
Approved by: jlebon
I built+installed ostree git master with
https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/723 in my dev container,
which broke the rpm-ostree tests. Kind of embarrassing that
I forgot to check rpm-ostree for usage of `ostree trivial-httpd`.
This is another thing that really wants a shared test container.
Anyways let's just use Python for this.
Closes: #684
Approved by: jlebon
One thing that's very confusing about OSTree is there are two layers -
deployments and the refs/commits. If one does an `rpm-ostree upgrade`, but then
e.g. `ostree admin undeploy 0`, you still have the new revision in the repo.
We don't do a good job of displaying this state, or helping people clean
it up.
Down the line, I also want to better support something like `rpm-ostree pull` to
cache updates explicitly *without* deploying.
This commit just adds a bit of information to the status display. We might want
to have better formatting, but I think this an OK start.
Closes: #595
Approved by: jlebon
I don't see a reason not to require more stuff to execute tests,
and having it be optional reduces our coverage unnecessarily.
Closes: #580
Approved by: jlebon
We seem to have substantial infrastructure drift here between the two, and I was
*really* confused why `TEST_SKIP_CLEANUP` wasn't being honored. Turned out in
rpm-ostree we have tmpdir code in two places, not entirely sure why. Punting
full cleanup.
Closes: #566
Approved by: jlebon
During a deploy operation, we would fetch commit objects from the remote
to resolve the version string. If gpg-verify was turned on, we would
fail to pull them if some of the commits were not signed. This is
because we pulled them in batches. We partially address this by only
fetching the HEAD commit on the first pass. This allows `upgrade`
operations to work just as well as `deploy` operations.
Though there is still an issue if we have to traverse farther back than
when signed commits become unsigned (unless they happen to fall on a
batch boundary). We leave that unsolved for now, since that would likely
require a more complex solution and it's not clear whether it's a real
world issue (signers can just retroactively sign commits).
Copy the gpghome from ostree so that we can test GPG-related cases in
our suite.
Closes: #527Closes: #557
Approved by: cgwalters
Expand the available options in the Rebase() D-Bus method to also have a
"revision" key. Its value has the same semantics as the "revision" key
in the Deploy() method (e.g. the "revision=" and "version=" prefixes are
also supported). Also expand the rebase CLI to allow for specifying the
revision as an additional argument.
This allows users to rebase to a specific version or checksum, rather
than only to the latest. Conceptually, this is the equivalent of doing a
rebase followed by a deploy. I.e. we specify an override-commit in the
origin and expect the same behaviours that apply after a deploy to also
apply here.
Closes: #212Closes: #555
Approved by: cgwalters
Our current compose tests only use a synthetic `empty.rpm`, but
this really limits usefulness.
Let's make a test suite that requires an internet connection and
downloads Fedora RPMs and does "real" tree composes.
See the updated `tests/README.md` for more information.
This is still a WIP.
Closes: #531
Approved by: jlebon
This is a very simple test harness inspired by the atomic one. It's a
simple bash script that sets up a permanent ssh connection to the host
and runs the test scripts. Also add a "demo" test-basic.sh test to make
sure that it works.
Closes: #344
Approved by: cgwalters
- Move all the uninstalled, non-destructive tests to check/
- Add a README
- Move utilities to utils/
- Move common files to common/
Closes: #304
Approved by: cgwalters
