IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This brings us back in sync with the latest libdnf git master. This
required a bunch of work both on the libdnf and rpm-ostree side to get
working. See e.g.
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/libdnf/issues/645.
A few things to adapt to:
- soname bump to `libdnf.so.2`
- `DnfAdvisory` is no longer a `GObject` (annoyingly it's not replaced
by something we can keep a ref on, so this requires some hacks to
steal from the `GPtrArray` -- could enhance libdnf for this later)
- disable SWDB history writing
- use new reldep public API
- update for latest `hy_subject_get_best_selector()` API
This now unlocks the possibility to add support for modules. (One can
see hints of this in the diff by the fact that `libdnf` links to
`libmodulemd1`.)
Update submodule: libdnf
Closes: #1404
Approved by: cgwalters
Seeing a 404 in the CentOS build for some reason...something like
older versions of git not following redirects maybe?
Update submodule: libglnx
Closes: #1374
Approved by: jlebon
We previously added a projectatomic/libdnf fork. I just pushed an
`rpmostree-branch` to there with one PR on top. This is an unfortunate turn but
the C++ thing still needs to be worked out.
Obviously we don't want a permanent fork, but I find it hard to justify spending
a whole lot of time pitching in to help with the libdnf C++ conversion versus
all the other work I could be doing.
Update submodule: libdnf
Closes: #1114
Approved by: jlebon
So I was trying to hack on my host's copy of rpm-ostree inside a pet
docker container, but ran into a conflict with libhif since dnf uses
it. I think we basically need to *always* build the bundled path,
rather than what I'm doing with CAHC and FADC where it's built as a
regular RPM.
It's not really sustainable right now for us to have both bundled and
not-bundled build paths - and we need to support co-installation with
dnf.
Another major issue is that we want to version lock with libhif -
right now our CI and both CAHC/FADC track libhif master, but that
means everything breaks if libhif breaks and we don't immediately
port.
git submodules solve all of these problems - the same as we're doing
with libglnx.
libglnx is *designed* for use as a git submodule, where as libhif
needs to support being both bundled and not-bundled. So we end up
with some hacks on our side, but I think it's all not too bad. I've
marked build rules with `# bundled libhif` so we know where to find
them later when libhif is stable.
Closes: #357
Approved by: jlebon
The high level goal is to deprecate libgsystem. I was trying to share
code between ostree/rpm-ostree, but it was too painful to commit to
forver frozen ABI for new utility APIs.
The git submodule approach will much more easily allow breaking
API/ABI, and iterate on APIs until they either land in GLib or not.
Note that libglnx will not use GFile*, so a full port to it will
involve also not using that. Thus, it will be necessarily
incremental; in the meantime we'll link to both libgsystem and
libglnx.
