IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
I'd like to add a new `boot-location: modules`. In prep
for that, let's remove the legacy `both` which drops into
`/boot`.
The libostree support for handling `/usr/lib/ostree-boot` has
existed for over 4 years:
```
commit 37a059925f6b96d30190b65bee6bdde0ae1c6915
Commit: Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>
CommitDate: Sun Nov 30 23:14:05 2014 -0500
deploy: Ensure that we can deploy using only /usr/lib/ostree-boot
```
I think we assume now that no one is now making *new* treecomposes and needs
a newer rpm-ostree and that they expect people to be able to use as an
upgrade target from a libostree that predates that.
Closes: #1773
Approved by: jlebon
There's lots of gyrations here for unified-core vs not; it's
been broken in the case of `--unified-core` for a while I think.
In that case our workdir is tmpdir, so rename that directory.
Closes: #1743
Approved by: jlebon
Split out of supporting "pure rojig" work. We also want
to support this for doing "oscontainers" as is planned for
Red Hat CoreOS. The user experience in both cases is oriented
around versioning of the external wrapper, not the inner ref/commit.
Note for users/builders who want to make use of this feature:
You probably want to mirror the changes in our test suite here to
use the compose JSON and parse the resulting `ostree-commit` out of that.
Closes: #1603
Approved by: jlebon
Right now `rpm-ostree compose tree` is very prescriptive about how things work.
Trying to add anything that isn't an RPM is absolutely fighting the system. Our
postprocessing system *enforces* no network access (good for reproducibilty, but
still prescriptive).
There's really a logical split between three phases:
- install: "build a rootfs that installs packages"
- postprocess: "run magical ostree postprocessing like kernel"
- commit: "commit result to ostree"
So there are two high level flows I'd like to enable here. First is to allow
people to do *arbitrary* postprocessing between `install` and `commit`. For
example, run Ansible and change `/etc`. This path basically is like what we have
today with `postprocess-script.sh`, except the builder can do anything they want
with network access enabled.
Going much farther, this helps us support a "build with Dockerfile" style flow.
We can then provide tooling to extract the container image, and combine
`postprocess` and `commit`.
Or completely the other way - if for example someone wants to use `rpm-ostree
compose install`, they could tar up the result as a Docker/OCI image. That's now
easier; an advantage of this flow over e.g. `yum --installroot` is the "change
detection" code we have.
Related issues/PRs:
- https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/pull/96
- https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/471
One disadvantage of this approach right now is that if one *does* go for
the split approach, we lose the "input hash" metadata for example. And
down the line, I'd like to add even more metadata, like the input rpm repos,
which could also be rendered on the client side.
But, I think we can address that later by e.g. caching the metadata in a file in
the install root and picking it back up or something.
Closes: #1039
Approved by: jlebon
