IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Start the ball rolling on converting some of our tests into
the coreos-assembler/kola framework:
d940420b78/mantle/kola/README-kola-ext.md
The nondestructive ones are easy.
We need to adapt some of our tests here which assume that `/sysroot` is
writable. However, in FCOS this is no longer the case now that we enable
`sysroot.readonly`.
We only remount rw for the couple of operations that need it so that we
still retain coverage for the ro path everywhere else.
There's a lot going on here, but essentially:
1. We change the `vmcheck` model so that it always operates on an
immutable base image. It takes that image and dynamically launches a
separate VM for each test using `kola spawn`. This means we can drop
a lot of hacks around re-using the same VMs.
2. Following from 1., `vmoverlay` now takes as input a base image,
overlays the built rpm-ostree bits, then creates a new base image. Of
course, we don't have to do this in CI, because we build FCOS with
the freshly built RPMs (so it uses `SKIP_VMOVERLAY=1`). `vmoverlay`
then will be more for the developer case where one doesn't want to
iterate via `cosa build` to test rpm-ostree changes. I say "will"
because the functionality doesn't exist yet; I'd like to enhance
`cosa dev-overlay` to do this. (Note `vmsync` should still works just
as before too.)
3. `vmcheck` can be run without building the tree first, as
`tests/vmcheck.sh`. The `make vmcheck` target still exists though for
finger compatibility and better meshing with `vmoverlay` in the
developer case.
What's really nice about using kola spawn is that it takes care of a lot
of things for us, such as the qemu command, journal and console
gathering, and SSH.
Similarly to the compose testsuites, we're using parallel here to run
multiple vmcheck tests at once. (On developer laptops, we cap
parallelism at `$(nproc) - 1`).
All this does is put the immutable bit on the target directory.
The intention is to replace this bit to start:
8b205bfbb9/src/create_disk.sh (L229)
However, the real goal here is to add code in this file
to handle redeploying the rootfs for Fedora CoreOS which
combines OSTree+Ignition:
https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/94
Basically doing this in proper Rust is going to be a lot
nicer than shell script in dracut modules. Among other
details, coreutils `mv` doesn't seem to do the right thing
for SELinux labels when policy isn't loaded.
Drop the use of Ansible everywhere. In the few cases where we really
Python, just spawn a container instead.
This is required to be able to hack on Fedora CoreOS.
Closes: #1850
Approved by: jlebon
This bumps the requirement on the controlling host to Python 3 only.
It also bumps the requirement on the target host to Python 3 as well
since FCOS doesn't ship Python 2 right now.
Though we'll need to eventually drop all Python usage anyway, but at
least let's get tests passing on FCOS first. (See related previous
patch).
Closes: #1828
Approved by: cgwalters
It's possible to run the `vmcheck` tests against an existing host that
has `rpm-ostree` already present. We don't overlay the built binaries
in this situation, so we should not check for the presence of the
overlay in the commit meta.
Closes: #1555
Approved by: cgwalters
Fix `--booted` was printing an extra line after `Deployments:`. While
we're there, also update the section name to `BootedDeployment:` in that
case to be more correct. (We're not printing all the deployments, only
the booted deployment.)
Closes: #1503
Approved by: cgwalters
Our test suite originated when package layering was still being
developed, but now that that's mature, the logic where layering
tests are distinct makes less sense.
The `basic` test had grown to really be a collection of many
miscellaneous things. Let's make that more explicit. Further,
let's avoid having each test suite grow too large; when a single
test fails we don't have an easy way to rerun just that test,
so a crude way to have faster local iteration is to split into groups.
My plan is to reintroduce a `basic` test that covers the basics
of all functionality - update, deploy, layering, etc. The advanced/corner
cases of layering like the `rm -rf /` test would still live in a
`test-layering.sh` or so.
Closes: #1336
Approved by: jlebon
