IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
We originally needed the pkgcache to be a separate repo due to ostree's
overzealous pruning policies. The idea was to maintain multiple commits
in each pkg branch for different SELinux policies. In practice, there's
not much use in maintaining old copies and it's just easier to always
relabel on the fly. So then, the need for a separate repo completely
melts away.
This helps simplify the mental model a bit and allows us to avoid subtle
issues like #1047. Note however that the core is still capable of
handling split repos for the `--ex-unified-core` compose use case. Once
that and the jigdo work are a bit more settled, we can have a clearer
picture of how to simplify the core further.
The tricky bit is migrating the cache. When deploying, we check if a
pkgcache repo exists and migrate its refs if so. We then leave behind a
symlink to the system repo to remain compatible with older rpm-ostrees.
Closes: #1055
Approved by: cgwalters
Related to: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/774
We aren't yet trying to render this in any way on the client side, but let's
start capturing the timestamp data now so that we can make use of it later
in e.g. `rpm-ostree status -v`.
Closes: #1072
Approved by: jlebon
In another PR I did the manual bridging of commit metadata to deployment
property, but that's annoying. Let's just bridge all commit metadata.
Closes: #1069
Approved by: jlebon
Now that we have a strong notion of `cache-only` mode, make use of it
when performing an `uninstall` or `ex override remove/reset`.
Closes: #944Closes: #1049
Approved by: cgwalters
I was linking to this code from elsewhere and noticed that
for our hardlink breaks we were not using fd-relative even
though we can. Down the line if we fork librpm into a separate
process and do e.g. `--dbpath=.` it'll do it too.
(Side note, I verified that commenting out the hardlink breaking
here was caught by the `ostree fsck` I added to the test suite)
Closes: #979
Approved by: jlebon
At one point `rpm-ostree install libvirt` dragged in libguestfs which in turn
brought in `syslinux-extlinux-nonlinux` which has files in `/boot/extlinux`,
which we rejected. (That dependency chain appears to have been fixed currently)
For the general case, this is just a partial fix in that we haven't nailed down
the semantics of how updates for `/boot` work. But in this particular case,
we'll just break libguestfs' `extlinux` verb, which I'm OK with.
Another case is `fwupdate-efi` - we require manual intervention to copy the
data into `/boot` after installing the package.
This is also preparation for [unified core](https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/729)
in that we now ensure imported kernels don't end up in `/boot` unless
explicitly configured.
Closes: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/853Closes: #969
Approved by: jlebon
This closes a longstanding bug - since package layering first
landed, we only checked for newer RPMs if the base tree changed.
In some scenarios like RHELAH, this doesn't matter much by default
since they move at the same cadence. Except if you use EPEL for example.
In Fedora, today the FAH releases are async of the rpm-md repos, and
there's also COPR which can update more than once a day even.
We should check for both update sources. Luckily we'd already introduced logic
for this in the treecompose case (checksumming the depsolved package sack). We
just need to start using it for client side assembly too.
Closes: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/391Closes: #911
Approved by: jlebon
Nuke all the previous goop that was used to create RPMs at `make check`
time and transition all the tests to use the new `build_rpm` function.
It definitely feels cleaner to use. It's also really nice to have the
spec live in the same file as the test that uses it.
Closes: #854
Approved by: cgwalters
In the error path when trying to remove a base package, we would try to
print a DnfPackage as char*, which of course didn't result in any
coherent output.
Closes: #833
Approved by: cgwalters
Pull #646 introduced a subtle regression: we went from always including
a "packages" entry to only including it if there are packages present.
Albeit it's easy to guard against, though to be nice, let's make it
easier for consumers by always including it.
Reported-by: Micah Abbott <miabbott@redhat.com>
Closes: #670
Approved by: cgwalters
See https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/233 - for RPMs which
place files in e.g. `/opt`, we have different behavior in the treecompose case
(silently drop it) versus package layering (does the wrong thing).
Since the unpacker right now is only used in the layering case, this just
ensures we'll get a consistent error there.
Closes: #624
Approved by: jlebon
We sometimes talk about using `ostree admin undeploy`, but that
doesn't know about the pkgcache, and hence space there leaks
until the next rpm-ostree operation.
Just for this, we need to expose a cleanup command (and API). But
we also need to support cleaning:
- repomd
- downloads (repo/tmp)
So let's start implementing that.
Closes: #614
Approved by: jlebon
I'm watching https://github.com/rpm-software-management/libdnf/pull/199 and I
really don't like it. We already have a place to put out-of-rpmdb metadata,
which is in the ostree commit for imported packages. No need to involve a
relational database for this (and further, one that would need to learn about
multiple ostrees).
We're not yet *using* this information in the UI, but we could; imagine
changing the `status` `Packages:` to show packages-per-repo or so. We
could also expose an `rpm-ostree pkg-info foo`.
But for now, let's just start recording this.
Closes: #610
Approved by: jlebon
One thing that's very confusing about OSTree is there are two layers -
deployments and the refs/commits. If one does an `rpm-ostree upgrade`, but then
e.g. `ostree admin undeploy 0`, you still have the new revision in the repo.
We don't do a good job of displaying this state, or helping people clean
it up.
Down the line, I also want to better support something like `rpm-ostree pull` to
cache updates explicitly *without* deploying.
This commit just adds a bit of information to the status display. We might want
to have better formatting, but I think this an OK start.
Closes: #595
Approved by: jlebon
When we checked out the base tree for package layering, we would create
the directory in which ostree did the checkout. This meant however that
ostree wouldn't apply xattrs on the root directory itself. This would
cause the directory to be mislabeled (as system_conf_t instead of
root_t), which in turn cause SELinux violations on reboot when systemd
tried to make the root mount shared.
This patch fixes this by first settling on a permanent directory in
which to do checkouts -- really, we'll never have multiple package
layering operations going on at the same time. Once we know that we have
a reserved path, we can safely let ostree create it for us with the
proper xattrs.
Resolves: RHBZ#1318547
Closes: #605
Approved by: cgwalters
- Rename test-layering.sh to test-layering-basic.sh and make it test
both pkg-add and pkg-remove.
- Add test-layering-relayer.sh, which verifies that pkgs are properly
relayered during the creation of new deployments (e.g. upgrades,
rebases, deploys).
- Add test-layering-rpmdb.sh, which verifies that packages respect the
rpm requirements before being overlayed.
Closes: #371
Approved by: cgwalters
