IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Note this PR requires [bubblewrap 0.2.0](https://github.com/projectatomic/bubblewrap/releases/tag/v0.2.0).
Change our bwrap invocations drop truly dangerous capabilities like
`cap_sys_admin` and `cap_sys_module` just like Docker does today. Because of the
popularity of Docker, we can be pretty sure that most RPM scripts should have
adapted to this (although a problematic area here is that traditional librpm
doesn't actually error out if scripts fail).
There are two reasons to do this:
- We want "offline" updates by default; updates shouldn't affect the
running system. If we prepare the new root in the background, a
%post shouldn't restart a service for example. We already "handle"
this by making `systemctl` a symlink to `/bin/true`, but this approach
also shuts off `%post`s that do e.g. `insmod`.
- Protection against accidental system damage
Closes: #1099
Approved by: jlebon
The "--ex" prefix here means it's an experimental option. A tremendous change
here is that start to support non-uid 0, but there are various things to fix there;
the unpacker for example needs to learn to set imported objects fully based
on the rpmfi information (i.e. default to uid 0, since libarchive gives the
current uid by default).
And even when run as uid 0, there are some bugs, though I'm not sure
of any showstoppers yet. For example, dracut's `dracut-install` calls
`cp --preserve=xattrs` which fails to copy the `user.ostreemeta` xattrs
from a checkout (it shouldn't be copying that anyways...)
Nevertheless, the infrastructure behind this really helps (is almost a hard
requirement for) the [jigdo effort](https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/1081).
Which is really only true due to SELinux - we need to import the packages,
then generate the final tree to get the final policy, then use that policy
to relabel all of the packages.
Closes: #940
Approved by: jlebon
It's no longer being built and is now older than the latest CentOS AH
release. This should help us no longer see messages like:
(rpm-ostree pkg-add:5662): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_variant_dict_lookup:
assertion 'is_valid_dict (dict)' failed
which happen because in #1034, we started using `G_VARIANT_DICT_INIT`,
whose special magic values only make sense in glib2 >= 2.50. (The alpha
image stopped at 2.46).
Saw this while debugging #1035.
Closes: #1040
Approved by: cgwalters
Start running `clang` with `-Werror` like ostree. We can only run this
on Fedora right now because the CentOS `clang` doesn't support
`-Wno-error=macro-redefined`, though that's fine.
Closes: #1036
Approved by: cgwalters
There's a lot of paths in the core related to SELinux policy changes and
relabeling packages. We currently have no test coverage for them. We add
support in the test libraries here to build such packages.
We also add a test that checks both that we correctly relabel RPMs when
the policy changes and that we handle layered packages that install
SELinux packages properly.
Closes: #999
Approved by: cgwalters
We have some unit-style tests that run `ex container`, but
they aren't "real"; they don't use scripts for example. Let's
add tests for this similar to `tests/compose`.
We use a 26 base, but the target repos need to be 27
to pick up the fix for: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478172
Add some bits to share infra between `tests/compose` and `tests/ex-container`;
basically handling the rpmmd repos. I tweaked things to be more streamlined
there between the `.papr.yml` and the test script.
Right now this is just one test for `bash`, but lays some of the infrastructure
for doing more. One thing that we need to do to improve more here is to better
cache RPMs, a bit like the compose tests do.
Closes: #1024
Approved by: jlebon
For https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/299 we need to make it
more convenient to substitute the architecture in an installation
context. I plan to use this API inside `rpmostreepayload` in Anaconda,
so we can substitute the same value of `${basearch}` we use in treefiles
since https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/pull/305
Now, you might wonder - why do we need an API wrapping libdnf? It's because
libdnf is not API stable yet. We're just exposing a tiny subset. In theory we
could use the Python dnf bindings in Anaconda, but things get slightly weird if
rpmostreepayload depends on dnf. Perhaps we'll do that down the road, but for
now this a small API surface to maintain (forever).
This change reworks the internal `varsubst` bits to take a pure `DnfContext`,
since we don't want to spin up a whole `RpmOstreeContext` just to do some
string substitutions.
Closes: #877
Approved by: jlebon
We don't currently install any installed tests usable by
gnome-desktop-testing. This conveniently works around not having it
readily packaged on CentOS, though we could always build from source if
the need comes.
Closes: #871
Approved by: cgwalters
We can be a bit less wasteful here by merging the check and vmcheck
suites into a single suite. The check suite today takes a negligible
amount of time to run, so we're not gaining much by parallelizing them.
It's more of a sanity check at this point before we start vmcheck.
Also start running vmcheck on CentOS 7. We adapt the ci scripts to
accomodate both Fedora and CentOS target machines.
This commit also switches to Fedora 26 as the primary test base.
Closes: #871
Approved by: cgwalters
Conceptually: we're going to move rpm-ostree and ostree at the same
cadence most of the time; for both releases *and* for git master.
The problem so far has been the latter part. Reusing FAHC
for the build gets us half of the problem.
The other trick I realized we can do - just pull ostree out from the build
container. This avoids fetching it from the internet, and makes my workflow for
hacking on both nicer - I just `sudo make install` in my build container for
ostree.
It's tempting to make the whole thing symmetric and require `sudo make install`
for rpm-ostree and not do the insttree thing but...perhaps after.
Closes: #758
Approved by: jlebon
The Dockerfile is problematic since we can't update it atomically. I also really
dislike reliance on the Hub. Further, I think rather than caching our build deps
as built containers, we should be caching RPMs in CI. And we should be using
rpm-ostree at some point to assemble filesystem trees faster.
Also, consolidate the clang to be serial with gcc, since while we lose a tiny
bit of parallelism, it's not really worth its own context right now.
Closes: #759
Approved by: jlebon
