IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This fixes another thing broken with `compose --ex-unified-core`;
for e.g. `/usr/bin/ping` from `iputils`, the classic example of a filecaps
binary.
As I'm writing this commit message I realize it will actually also
take effect for package layering unnecessarily; we'll pointlessly
break the hardlink. But eh, it doesn't matter right now, we can
optimize that later.
Closes: #1151
Approved by: jlebon
Having the "jigdo set" in repodata makes it so we can parallel download the
jigdo RPM with the set. However for now, I kept the jigdo set in the jigdoRPM,
since that way it'll be covered by the signature.
Also, this changes the way we inject metadata to use a magic comment string,
since trying to pass a gigantic macro to `rpmbuild` via its argv didn't work out
so well (it looks like rpmbuild eats newlines). This approach is more robust.
Closes: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/1132Closes: #1140
Approved by: jlebon
We are going to want versioning on the jigdo RPMs, since it's
highly likely things change.
This is done via new magic '-D rpmostree_jigdo_meta` macro, which we can also
use for other things down the line.
Closes: #1135
Approved by: jlebon
Tracking issue: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/1081
To briefly recap: Let's experiment with doing ostree-in-RPM, basically the
"compose" process injects additional data (SELinux labels for example) in an
"ostree image" RPM, like `fedora-atomic-host-27.8-1.x86_64.rpm`. That "ostree
image" RPM will contain the OSTree commit+metadata, and tell us what RPMs we
need need to download. For updates, like `yum update` we only download changed
RPMs, plus the new "oirpm". But SELinux labeling, depsolving, etc. are still
done server side, and we still have a reliable OSTree commit checksum.
This is a lot like [Jigdo](http://atterer.org/jigdo/)
Here we fully demonstrate the concept working end-to-end; we use the
"traditional" `compose tree` to commit a bunch of RPMs to an OSTree repo, which
has a checksum, version etc. Then the new `ex commit2jigdo` generates the
"oirpm". This is the "server side" operation. Next simulating the client side,
`jigdo2commit` takes the OIRPM and uses it and downloads the "jigdo set" RPMs,
fully regenerating *bit for bit* the final OSTree commit.
If you want to play with this, I'd take a look at the `test-jigdo.sh`; from
there you can find other useful bits like the example `fedora-atomic-host.spec`
file (though the canonical copy of this will likely land in the
[fedora-atomic](http://pagure.io/fedora-atomic) manifest git repo.
Closes: #1103
Approved by: jlebon
When we added the `--ex-unified-core` option our caching story got
very messy because the non-unified core caches RPMs, but unified
does ostree repo caching.
For jigdo, we want the RPMs. Fix this by mirroring the RPMs using
`--download-only` and pointing the tests consistently at that.
Closes: #1122
Approved by: jlebon
Related to: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/49
We want to support "name binding" per client system, rather than
having a hardcoded mapping in our tree. Currently if e.g. a new
daemon is added as a dependency (or as part of e.g. systemd) it's
easy to silently miss it.
This is prep for doing that binding client side consistently, which is what we
do with package layering.
Closes: #1077
Approved by: jlebon
We won't have done the postprocessing, so `/usr/lib/passwd` won't exist. Trying
to use `compose install` with current fedora-atomic failed (I *really* should
have tested that at least manually with the final patchset). Add `check-passwd`
to the test suite so this gets coverage too.
Closes: #1076
Approved by: jlebon
We have some unit-style tests that run `ex container`, but
they aren't "real"; they don't use scripts for example. Let's
add tests for this similar to `tests/compose`.
We use a 26 base, but the target repos need to be 27
to pick up the fix for: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478172
Add some bits to share infra between `tests/compose` and `tests/ex-container`;
basically handling the rpmmd repos. I tweaked things to be more streamlined
there between the `.papr.yml` and the test script.
Right now this is just one test for `bash`, but lays some of the infrastructure
for doing more. One thing that we need to do to improve more here is to better
cache RPMs, a bit like the compose tests do.
Closes: #1024
Approved by: jlebon
We can be a bit less wasteful here by merging the check and vmcheck
suites into a single suite. The check suite today takes a negligible
amount of time to run, so we're not gaining much by parallelizing them.
It's more of a sanity check at this point before we start vmcheck.
Also start running vmcheck on CentOS 7. We adapt the ci scripts to
accomodate both Fedora and CentOS target machines.
This commit also switches to Fedora 26 as the primary test base.
Closes: #871
Approved by: cgwalters
During provisioning, PAPR injects a fedora.repo pointing at a much
better & faster mirror than dl.fp.o. Let's use that to make the compose
test less flaky. Hoping to make these sorts of optimizations more
discoverable in upstream PAPR.
Closes: #799
Approved by: cgwalters
Our current compose tests only use a synthetic `empty.rpm`, but
this really limits usefulness.
Let's make a test suite that requires an internet connection and
downloads Fedora RPMs and does "real" tree composes.
See the updated `tests/README.md` for more information.
This is still a WIP.
Closes: #531
Approved by: jlebon
