IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The `rust-toolset` package does not exist in Fedora, so we cannot
use it for BuildRequires. Change the conditional to exclude ELN
from the %rhel conditional.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@redhat.com>
We don't *actually* use this ourself, but librepo does, and libdnf gets confused
if librepo doesn't support it. This is the case in RHEL8 currently.
Basically what breaks is trying to use the Fedora EPEL repo (has zchunk metadata)
on RHEL CoreOS. And we have a test in kola that does this today.
Since D-Bus 1.9.18 configuration files installed by third-party should
go in share/dbus-1/system.d. The old location is for sysadmin overrides.
Closes: #1903
Approved by: jlebon
So this is a somewhat significant change, but I'd like to try having the
canonical spec file upstream. A few reasons for this:
1. We integrate tightly with the distros we're destined for, and so
we're in a pretty good position for knowing how the software should
be packaged.
2. We can atomically change packaging along with the rest of the code.
This has important ramifications, including that it'll be easier to
integrate with continuous build services like Packit, but releases
will also be less fraught with last-minute packaging fixes.
3. I'm playing with Jenkins pipelines and there I'd like to make RPMs
the "artifact" that gets moved down the pipeline into later stages
(e.g. `cosa build`). We could even eventually make it an actual
external artifact so that anyone can easily download RPMs from any
random PR for testing. (And in fact, with a thin yumrepo layer on
top, it could be used to replace Packit/rdgo entirely).
Not that this approach doesn't have issues as well (e.g. on the dist-git
side, we'll need some minimal tooling to merge in the changelog), though
I think it's worth trying out.
Closes: #1900
Approved by: cgwalters
This allows non-root users access to the rpm-ostree daemon, which is
a pre-requirement for gnome-software rpm-ostree support.
Closes: #745Closes: #825
Approved by: cgwalters
We'll keep a copy here for now, though the canonical
version should be viewed as the Fedora dist-git.
Updated-by: Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>
Closes: #667
Approved by: jlebon
This is in preparation for `rpm-ostree container`, which handles
unpacking RPMs as non-root.
At the moment, I'm copying code in from both ostree's libarchive bits
(fixable...may need to export some utility functions) and some
functions from libhif (harder, see:
http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-ecosystem/2016-January/000297.html )
There's lots more cleanup to do here, but I don't want to block on the
resolution of the libhif changes.
This will move to a separate repository. This allows a clearer
separation between the core tool (which is shipped on client systems
too), and the compose infrastructure.
Furthermore, I want to make the autobuilder a Docker container.
This is somewhat similar to what we've been doing with Continuous; we
take the manifest.json, and turn it into a "snapshot". Except here
there is a notion of inheritance.
This gets stored into the tree as /usr/share/rpm-ostree/treefile.json.
Additionally, it goes into the autobuilder directory in
products-built.json. Though really we should split up that file,
since it will be kind of...large.
There are two major reasons:
1) I want to do things like process SELinux labels here, and that
type of thing is best done in C.
2) There are presently 3 languages in this code, and this takes us
down to just two.
