IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Add a note that only certain paths actually make sense in the
`add-files` directive and link to the OSTree docs. Let's also the
examples given to more realistic and correct ones.
Closes: #1643
Approved by: cgwalters
I'm trying to have a more opinionated model where custom builds
use inheritance, and currently one can only have a single
`postprocess-script`.
Further, in YAML it's very convenient to use inline vs external
data.
Closes: #1527
Approved by: jlebon
This is for: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/718
But I'm not going to close that issue as this only does the server
side, and I think we should support it client side too.
Since I wrote that issue, we ended up skipping the `dnf_transaction_depsolve()`
API, and hence we don't need to block on a libdnf change. So
this was quite simple.
Closes: #1513
Approved by: jlebon
Rather than silently ignoring it.
In theory...we could write to /usr/lib/systemd instead of `/etc`
but eh...I feel like what we really want to do is make it convenient
to write a preset file from the YAML.
(We could have an `add-files` content that takes values literally
which would be nice in YAML and suck in JSON)
A general thread running through this is that for people making
*derivatives* of a CoreOS-like system, having to create their
own `exampleos-release` package is an annoying hurdle.
Anyways for now we're fixing the bug that we were silently ignoring
it.
Closes: #1488
Approved by: jlebon
The rojig spec is almost entirely rpm-ostree implementation details;
let's not have lots of people fork/duplicate it. Rather add the bits
of rojig to the treefile that people need to define (most notably
the name).
Prep for stabilizing rojig.
I had a few false starts with this PR; managing ownership/lifetimes
across C/Rust is just complicated. I got bit hard by the fact that
the workdir in `--unified-core` is really dfd-relative, and had to
do a dance to propagate the dfd into rust, as well as down into
the rojig builder.
Closes: #1484
Approved by: jlebon
We actually want systemd's `ConditionFirstBoot` to fire. The
primary rationale here is that we're adopting Ignition for Fedora CoreOS,
and having `ConditionFirstBoot=` function will help a lot, as the idea
is it only runs once.
However, I discovered that this breaks the `units` directive for example,
as systemd blows away all the unit state in `/etc`. The correct thing
to do from the start is to use presets. We could add an implementation of
`units` which works with this on and instead writes a preset file but...eh.
My plan is to at some point introduce an "epoch" and flip various defaults,
this one, `tmp-is-dir`, the passwd file handling, etc.
See: https://github.com/dustymabe/bootengine/pull/11Closes: #1425
Approved by: jlebon
This adds some additional help to the man page and the RTD page around
using local packages with the install/uninstall commands.
Closes: #1388
Approved by: cgwalters
I noticed that Ubuntu also uses the original "jigdo", so let's start
pulling off the band-aid here and do a mass rename.
For this first pass I'm focusing on CLI entrypoints and docs, as that's what
people are going to see; renaming all of the internal C functions, structure
variables etc. can come later.
Closes: #1269
Approved by: jlebon
Part of the goal of jigdo ♲📦 is to support organizations switching to *only*
providing RPMs. An intermediate step there is to "lock" the repo and jigdo
together; we don't want to update the ref if building the jigdoRPM fails.
Add an option to perform `rpm-ostree compose tree` and `rpm-ostree ex
commit2jigdo` together; notably we generate a commit, but only update the ref
once the jigdoRPM is built.
Closes: #1165
Approved by: jlebon
The old branch examples use Fedora 26 which is almost EOL. The new
Fedora 27 examples show off the various `testing` and `updates`
branches, as well as the support for different arches.
Closes: #1175
Approved by: cgwalters
This is prep for split-compose. We have some options in the
treefile, like `boot_location` and `tmp-is-dir` etc. While those
are useful options, I don't want to force everyone using
`rpm-ostree compose postprocess` to write a treefile.
Change the code then to accept a `NULL` treefile to mean
"use the defaults".
Closes: #1070
Approved by: jlebon
Prep for changing `boot_location: new` to use `/usr/lib/ostree-boot`
and `/usr/lib/modules`. Rework our kernel postprocessing
so that we unify the `boot_location` handling with initramfs generation.
Instead of doing the initramfs first in postprocessing, we do it nearly last,
after e.g. `etc` is renamed to `usr/etc`. This has some consequences, such as
the fact that `run_bwrap_mutably()` is now called in both situations. In
general, our handling of `etc` is inconsistent, although understandably so.
As part of this, I finally got around to implementing the bit from
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/4174 however suboptimal it is; need the
unified core so we can cleanly ignore the posttrans like we do others. We
intentionally keep the file around in the generated tree so that installing a
kernel RPM per client doesn't try to do any of this either.
This all gets folded together so that the logic for handling the bootloader gets
simpler - in the Fedora case, we now know to find kernels in `/usr/lib/modules`
and can ignore `/boot`.
Closes: #959
Approved by: jlebon
We have 3 locations to find kernels now; I can't think of
a reason to support placing kernels *only* in `/boot`. The
original commit
15ecaacd36
doesn't give a reason, and I certainly can't think of one now.
This makes `legacy` be an alias for `both`, which should be fully compatible.
Prep for further refactoring towards changing `new` to mean both
`/usr/lib/ostree-boot` *and* `/usr/lib/modules`.
Closes: #959
Approved by: jlebon
- Focus on `rpm-ostree` rather than `atomic host` since...well, a
lot of stuff isn't exposed there and the whole branding is confusing.
- Mention `ex`, `rebase` etc.
Closes: #908
Approved by: miabbott
Closes: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/546
Previously, we'd open up the host's rpmdb for both `compose tree`
and `ex container`. In the first case, because we require root, we'd
succeed. For `ex container`, we'd spew an error.
Fixing this was trickier than I thought. First because there was
*also* a libdnf bug here: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/libdnf/pull/307
Second, there's a compatibility hazard here for anyone using `.repo` files that
reference `$releasever`. This actually happened to me with `ex container` as I'd
just done a `ln -s /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo rpmmd.repos.d`. I fixed
that first by doing a `sed -i -e 's,$releasever,26,' rpmmd.repos.d/*.repo`.
As far as I can see today, none of Fedora Atomic or CentOS AH rely on this. But
in order to enhance compatibility, let's add a "releasever" option. This makes
it easier again to reuse stock `.repo` files if we wanted to do so.
(Also, I realized we can just use `/usr/share/empty` as *the* canonical immutable
empty directory)
Closes: #875
Approved by: jlebon
There are a few reasons to do this. First, systemd changed to refuse mounts on
symlinks, and hence if one *wants* "/tmp-on-tmpfs", one would need to write a
different `sysroot-tmp.mount` unit.
Second, the original rationale for having this symlink was that if you had
multiple ostree stateroots ("osnames"), it's nicer if they had the same `/tmp`
to avoid duplication. But in practice today that's already an issue due to
`/var/tmp`, and further the multiple-stateroot case is pretty unusual. And that
case is *further* broken by SELinux (if one wanted to have e.g. an Ubuntu and
Fedora) stateroots. So let's fully decouple this and make `/tmp` a plain
old directory by default, so systemd's `tmp.mount` can become useful.
Now, things get interesting for the case where someone wants a physical `/tmp`
that *does* persist across reboots. Right now, if one just did a `systemctl mask
tmp.mount` as we do in Fedora Atomic Host's cloud images, you'd get a semantic
where `/tmp` stays per-deployment, which is weird. Our recommendation for
that should likely be to set up a bind mount for `/tmp` → `/var/tmp`.
For now, this stays an option to ensure compatibility; if FAH Cloud images
want to stay with "physical /tmp", then we'd have to change the kickstart.
Closes: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/669Closes: #778
Approved by: jlebon
Add a few more tests to exercise some of the treefile options. We do
need to also expand test-basic.sh itself to sanity-check the structure
of a normal ostree compose. That's up next on the list.
Closes: #548
Approved by: cgwalters
Add some notes in the manual about package layering. Would be nice to
have `ostree admin unlock` also be part of the ostree manual for a
better contrast of the two.
Looking at the other snippets in the document, this makes me think we
probably should also add wrappers in `/usr/bin/atomic` for the new
commands. Or maybe we should wait until they're not in preview mode
anymore.
Closes: #374
Approved by: cgwalters
We should make this less abstract and rather point people directly at
the CentOS bits as it's more likely to be a real-world useful example
and produce something they want.
Fix a few other typos and bits.
Closes: #279
Approved by: miabbott
This will allow to copy arbitrary files into the rootfs, specifying something like:
"add-files": [["service.template", "/exports/service.template"],
["config.json.template", "/exports/config.json.template"]]
It is quite useful when building a container image.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
Closes: #253
Approved by: cgwalters
