IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
All this does is put the immutable bit on the target directory.
The intention is to replace this bit to start:
8b205bfbb9/src/create_disk.sh (L229)
However, the real goal here is to add code in this file
to handle redeploying the rootfs for Fedora CoreOS which
combines OSTree+Ignition:
https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/94
Basically doing this in proper Rust is going to be a lot
nicer than shell script in dracut modules. Among other
details, coreutils `mv` doesn't seem to do the right thing
for SELinux labels when policy isn't loaded.
Drop the use of Ansible everywhere. In the few cases where we really
Python, just spawn a container instead.
This is required to be able to hack on Fedora CoreOS.
Closes: #1850
Approved by: jlebon
This bumps the requirement on the controlling host to Python 3 only.
It also bumps the requirement on the target host to Python 3 as well
since FCOS doesn't ship Python 2 right now.
Though we'll need to eventually drop all Python usage anyway, but at
least let's get tests passing on FCOS first. (See related previous
patch).
Closes: #1828
Approved by: cgwalters
It's possible to run the `vmcheck` tests against an existing host that
has `rpm-ostree` already present. We don't overlay the built binaries
in this situation, so we should not check for the presence of the
overlay in the commit meta.
Closes: #1555
Approved by: cgwalters
Fix `--booted` was printing an extra line after `Deployments:`. While
we're there, also update the section name to `BootedDeployment:` in that
case to be more correct. (We're not printing all the deployments, only
the booted deployment.)
Closes: #1503
Approved by: cgwalters
Our test suite originated when package layering was still being
developed, but now that that's mature, the logic where layering
tests are distinct makes less sense.
The `basic` test had grown to really be a collection of many
miscellaneous things. Let's make that more explicit. Further,
let's avoid having each test suite grow too large; when a single
test fails we don't have an easy way to rerun just that test,
so a crude way to have faster local iteration is to split into groups.
My plan is to reintroduce a `basic` test that covers the basics
of all functionality - update, deploy, layering, etc. The advanced/corner
cases of layering like the `rm -rf /` test would still live in a
`test-layering.sh` or so.
Closes: #1336
Approved by: jlebon
