IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
In preparation for publishing this to crates.io and moving
into e.g. github.com/ostreedev/ostree-host-rs
So that ostree upstream can move forward with more Rust on the
"top level".
Same motivation as https://github.com/coreos/bootupd/pull/163
Effectively what we're doing here is creating a human-readable subset
of the stack trace. This is nicer than having the calling functions
add with_context() because it's more verbose (gets duplicative at
each call site), easy to forget, etc.
We have fully transitioned to cxx-rs! This drops a lot of now
dead code; only one binding system to think about generating
source code. For example, a notable advantage of cxx-rs
is it doesn't scan the whole source code, so running `make`
doesn't spew errors from cbindgen not understanding bits.
cxx-rs only supports a few basic types in `Vec<T>`/`CxxVector<T>`
and we need to pass an array of GObjects in a few cases.
Add a wrapper class hack instead of using `u64` so we at least
have some basic safety here and have a convenient place to
grep for later when we want to improve this.
Right now, we're using libdnf APIs from Rust via hand-crafted `extern C`
interfaces, which is extra dangerous because there is no signature
checking that happens at compile-time.
Until either we can automate libdnf bindings or use its C++ API directly
via cxx.rs, let's do some basic wrapping in C++ ourselves and use libdnf
through that API only instead. That gives us a lot more confidence and
makes the libdnf API feel more natural to use in Rust.
This is now further migration towards Cargo/Rust possible
because we switched our main binary. We've had an internal
`libdnf-sys` crate for a while, but now it can take over
the build of the underlying library too (like many `-sys`
crates support).
This itself is just an incremental step towards migrating
the main rpm-ostree build system to e.g. cmake too (or
perhaps directly with the `cc` crate, not sure yet) and
driving it via `cargo` too.
First explicitly state that we're a workspace. AIUI
this is actually implicit today via our use of a `path`
dependency, but in the future we may have other sub-crates.
So let's make it explicit now.
Also move the libdnf dependencies directly to that sub-crate.
This allows us to fully use cxx-rs with `extern "C++"`. Now
we do call back into the C/C++ today, but it only works outside
of cargo/Rust's knowledge. Most notably, it means we can't
use our C code in `cargo test`. And that's a problem
for moving some C/C++ code to Rust, because we want to port
the unit tests too.
For now, re-declare our dependencies and part of the build
system inside the Cargo build. However, this is also
an important step towards using Cargo as our *sole* build
system.
We don't add build dependencies too often, so the short
term duplication should be OK.
However, a major unfortunate side effect of this is that
we now need to serialize the build process; almost all the
C/C++ comes first (`librpmostreeinternals.la`) and then
the Rust build, then we finally generate the executable
with both.
The only way out of this really is to move more of the
C/C++ build into Cargo, and we probably want to refactor
into internal crates.
This adds support for a new `rpm-ostree compose extensions` command`
which takes a treefile, a new extensions YAML file, and an OSTree repo
and ref. It performs a depsolve and downloads the extensions to a
provided output directory.
This is intended to replace cosa's `download-extensions`:
https://github.com/coreos/coreos-assembler/blob/master/src/download-extensions
The input YAML schema matches the one accepted by that script.
Some differences from the script:
- We have a guaranteed depsolve match and thus can avoid silly issues
we've hit in RHCOS (like downloading the wrong `libprotobuf` for
`usbguard` -- rhbz#1889694).
- We seamlessly re-use the same repos defined in the treefile, whereas
the cosa script uses `reposdir=$dir` which doesn't have the same
semantics (repo enablement is in that case purely based on the
`enabled` flag in those repos, which may be different than what the
rpm-ostree compose ran with).
- We perform more sanity-checks against the requested extensions, such
as whether the extension is already in the base.
- We support no-change detection via a state SHA512 file for better
integration in cosa and pipelines.
- We support a `match-base-evr` key, which forces the extension to have
the same EVR as the one from a base package: this is helpful in the
case of extensions which complement a base package, esp. those which
may not have strong enough reldeps to enforce matching EVRs by
depsolve alone (`kernel-headers` is an example of this).
- We don't try to organize the RPMs into separate directories by
extension because IMO it's not at the right level. Instead, we should
work towards higher-level metadata to represent extensions (see
https://github.com/openshift/os/issues/409 which is related to this).
Closes: #2055
